A certain state in the US has introduced AI safety legislation requiring large AI developers to disclose safety protocols and report security incidents within 72 hours. The maximum fine is $1 million. Although OpenAI supports the bill, lobbying organizations oppose it, demonstrating that tech giants have different interests in state-level regulation, reflecting the game between capital and industry.
The abstract is generated by AI
View Original
Expand All
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
ILCollector:
72-hour reporting? Isn't this forcing big companies to report each other haha
Another state-level regulation, it looks like the US is about to run the Web3 playbook again
OpenAI's support makes sense; after all, they are big enough, small companies should be the ones worried
The division of interests is really interesting, it looks like fighting among allies
Regulations are tightening more and more, there will probably be more developments later
2025 is not over yet, and the S&P 500 index has performed well, but whether this can continue in the future remains uncertain. Analysis points out that the U.S. stock market needs to address three key issues, which have significant implications for the financial market ecosystem and digital asset investors, influencing capital flows and risk appetite, and affecting global investment strategies.
The abstract is generated by AI
View Original
Expand All
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
SingleForYears:
Three consecutive years of growth? Wall Street's move is quite aggressive, but it seems the trend might change next year, so we need to keep a close eye.
【BlockBeats】Recently, a piece of news has sparked quite a discussion in the crypto circle—MSCI might remove listed companies that hold large amounts of Bitcoin and digital assets from its indices. Here's what happened. In October, MSCI proposed a suggestion: if a company's digital asset holdings account for more than 50% of its total assets, it should be excluded from the global benchmark index. The reasoning is straightforward—MSCI believes such companies are more like investment funds rather than genuine operating enterprises, and funds are not part of their index system. But here’s the problem. Once this proposal was announced, many companies were not happy. They claim they are real businesses developing products, and MSCI’s move is an unfair discrimination against the crypto industry. After all, inspired by recent years, more and more traditional companies are including cryptocurrencies and digital assets on their balance sheets in hopes of sharing the appreciation dividends. According to analysts’ estimates,
MSCI's move this time is really impressive. They keep saying that others are not "real operating companies," so why isn't anyone regulating Tesla for hoarding so much Bitcoin? Double standards.
Korean lawmakers call on the government and financial institutions to collaborate to accelerate the legalization of stablecoins, emphasizing their importance in global payment standards. They believe that stablecoins have become an irreversible trend, with the key being the speed and manner of their rollout.
The abstract is generated by AI
View Original
Expand All
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
BoredStaker:
Regarding stablecoins, the Korean lawmakers finally spoke out; it should have been handled this way a long time ago.
Recent BTC trends indicate that the bullish momentum is weakening, with price fluctuations oscillating and currently below the level of the 12th noon. Despite the appearance of a hammer pattern, trading volume is shrinking, indicating diminishing upward momentum. Overall analysis suggests that the short-term upward trend still exists, but attention should be paid to changes in trading volume, and appropriate buy and sell points and stop-loss levels should be set.
【BiTu】U.S. November inflation data released, and the results are shocking—far below economists' predictions. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate unexpectedly rose, and this combination of data caught the market off guard. Manulife Investment Management's Head of U.S. Rates and Mortgage Trading, Michael Lorizio, recently made a judgment: although the federal government shutdown has increased informational noise, the current space for inflation to continue rising significantly beyond expectations is actually limited. In other words, the data has already returned to a relatively manageable range. The key point is—if the labor market continues to deteriorate, with the monthly unemployment rate rising by 0.1 percentage points, then the market may seriously underestimate the room for rate cuts next year. At that time, the central bank's policy adjustment room could be much larger than currently imagined. This is worth paying attention to for overall asset allocation expectations.
View Original
Expand All
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
governance_ghost:
Inflation cools down and the unemployment rate rises; this combination punch is indeed interesting. I understand the logic that the room for interest rate cuts has been underestimated, but it's still a bit early to say that now.
【Block Rhythm】On-chain monitoring data shows that a trader has staged a "harvesting" show on the Hyperliquid platform with a keen market sense. The address named pension-usdt.eth has accumulated a profit of $24.04 million over the past month, with 16 out of 17 trades since December being profitable, resulting in a hit rate of 94.1%. This trader's current ETH long position is massive—holding 30,000 ETH worth $89.72 million, firmly ranking in the top 3 for ETH long positions on Hyperliquid. Interestingly, his average opening price was set at $2,969.6, providing ample profit potential in subsequent market movements. Just 9 hours ago, this whale had just completed a BTC short position closing trade, extracting from this transaction again.
Damn, is this guy for real? A 94% win rate—no one would believe it if I said it... 24 million a month, I've lost my pants, and he's still harvesting. Is this the gap?
Macroeconomic analyst Luke Gromen was previously bullish on Bitcoin but has recently turned bearish, mainly because Bitcoin is highly correlated with tech stocks, and its future prospects are concerning. Additionally, liquidity tightening and the potential threat of quantum computing are important factors. Tether is increasing investments in AI and gold, indicating that the market is undergoing asset adjustments.
【Blockchain Rhythm】Trump claims that Trump Gold Card sales are booming, with sales exceeding $1.3 billion. However, the prediction platform Polymarket has raised serious doubts about this figure. Polymarket explicitly states that only sales data that have been finalized and paid for can be recognized. Trump's statement on December 19 regarding Gold Card sales, as well as Howard Lutnick's claim that "$1.3 billion worth was sold in just a few days," do not meet this standard — because these are merely sales claims and do not meet the strict condition of "payment completed." The best indicator of the issue is the prediction data itself. As of now, the probability on Polymarket that Trump Gold Card sales this year are $0 remains as high as 89%, reflecting widespread skepticism in the market about the authenticity of the official statement. T
View Original
Expand All
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
just_here_for_vibes:
Laughing out loud, it's the same old number game again
89% of them bet that sales are zero, which really explains the problem well
The gold card is just a scam to collect IQ taxes, stay tuned for what's next
The U.S. Department of Justice has begun releasing publicly the Epstein case investigation files and has warned that some victim information may still be exposed. Deputy Attorney General Blanc said that the identities of more than 1,200 victims have been confirmed for deletion, and plans to release hundreds of thousands of documents on the 19th. A full disclosure will take several weeks.
The abstract is generated by AI
View Original
Expand All
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
bridgeOops:
Over 1,200 victims... this number is truly astonishing, involving many big shots.
[CoinPush] JPMorgan's recent analysis report has dealt a blow to the stablecoin market. According to their forecast, by 2028, the supply of stablecoins may hover between $50 billion and $60 billion, far below the industry's most optimistic estimates of $2 trillion to $4 trillion. How big is the gap? The difference is 3 to 6 times. What is the current situation? Since the beginning of this year, the stablecoin market has grown by approximately $100 billion, with a total current size of $308 billion. USDT and USDC, the two major players, have contributed the main growth. But where does this growth come from? It is mainly not from payment scenarios, but from trading scenarios. DeFi and derivatives trading are the true driving forces behind the demand for stablecoin collateral, with new stablecoin holdings on derivatives exchanges reaching $20 billion. What about payment applications? Currently, they are still a weakness. However, analysts believe that as more service providers begin testing cross- based on stablecoins,
View Original
Expand All
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
RektCoaster:
JPMorgan is starting to be bearish again. Their predictions are too conservative, it feels like they're setting traps for retail investors.
Payment scenarios are indeed underwhelming, mostly just hype.
Derivatives trading driving stablecoins is the real picture.
The true use cases are for trading hedges, payment applications, and other opportunities, but let's wait until those trends emerge.
A 3-6 times gap is a bit exaggerated; it's better to look at the actual growth rate before making judgments.
Large technology companies provide $5 billion in financing support to Bitcoin miners through data center leasing partnerships, helping miners upgrade infrastructure and shift towards AI computing supply chains. Market expectations are that miner stock prices will rise significantly, and tech giants will obtain equity subscription warrants, tightly binding the interests of both parties, demonstrating the industry's pursuit of new growth stories.
Miners are really about to take off this time, with 5 billion being poured in. This is a classic "we all cut the leeks together" rhythm... But on the other hand, shifting towards AI infrastructure does have some substance. They've been mining coins before, and now with tech giants backing and directly building the computing power supply chain, the landscape instantly elevates.
Tripling the stock price? Uh... I'll first see if anyone is really chasing the high to take over, anyway, I've heard too many stories of "binding interests" like this.
It's a bit interesting, but I wonder if it will turn into another round of harvesting later.
I always feel like this is just big companies using miners' shells to hype concepts... But whatever, I'll get on board first, since it's backed by big firms.