【Crypto World】U.S. regulators take new action. Recently, the governor of a U.S. state signed into law an AI safety legislation, becoming the second state in the country to introduce a major AI safety regulatory framework.
The core requirements of the bill are quite strict: large AI developers must disclose safety protocol details, report any safety incidents within 72 hours, and face fines up to $1 million. This combination of mandatory disclosure and rapid response is clearly aimed at reducing systemic risks.
Interestingly, leading AI companies like OpenAI have expressed support, believing this is a necessary step toward industry standardization. However, lobbying organizations backed by major capital are pushing back, pointing fingers at the main proponents of the bill. What does this contrast reveal? Even among tech giants, interests in state-level regulation vary—some seek transparency and standards to set benchmarks, while others are more concerned about the costs of overregulation.
Compared to the regulatory path of Web3, such policy polarization is not unfamiliar. From DeFi to stablecoins and now AI regulation, capital and industry are constantly vying.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ILCollector
· 4h ago
72-hour reporting? Isn't this forcing big companies to report each other haha
Another state-level regulation, it looks like the US is about to run the Web3 playbook again
OpenAI's support makes sense; after all, they are big enough, small companies should be the ones worried
The division of interests is really interesting, it looks like fighting among allies
Regulations are tightening more and more, there will probably be more developments later
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 4h ago
Report within 72 hours? That's quite aggressive, but I'm actually a bit confused that OpenAI supports me.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 4h ago
Report within 72 hours, a fine of 1 million... That's a pretty harsh measure, but OpenAI's support is a good sign, indicating that the industry really wants to shake off the label of wild growth.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 4h ago
I really can't hold it anymore. OpenAI sounds nice, but they actually just want to pass the buck to small players. They've been compliant all along, right?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLady
· 4h ago
ngl openai playing 4d chess here... support regs to squeeze out the competition while they already got the infrastructure to handle it. classic move tbh. the 72hr reporting window tho? that's basically asking devs to optimize their incident response like we optimize gas. whoever lobbying against this probably has way too much to hide lmao
Reply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 4h ago
Report within 72 hours, fined up to 1 million. What is OpenAI pretending to support... The lobbying behind the capital is the real voice, right?
US AI Regulation Upgraded Again: State-Level Bills Spark Industry Divisions
【Crypto World】U.S. regulators take new action. Recently, the governor of a U.S. state signed into law an AI safety legislation, becoming the second state in the country to introduce a major AI safety regulatory framework.
The core requirements of the bill are quite strict: large AI developers must disclose safety protocol details, report any safety incidents within 72 hours, and face fines up to $1 million. This combination of mandatory disclosure and rapid response is clearly aimed at reducing systemic risks.
Interestingly, leading AI companies like OpenAI have expressed support, believing this is a necessary step toward industry standardization. However, lobbying organizations backed by major capital are pushing back, pointing fingers at the main proponents of the bill. What does this contrast reveal? Even among tech giants, interests in state-level regulation vary—some seek transparency and standards to set benchmarks, while others are more concerned about the costs of overregulation.
Compared to the regulatory path of Web3, such policy polarization is not unfamiliar. From DeFi to stablecoins and now AI regulation, capital and industry are constantly vying.