Bitcoindata21

I've heard a few times that all arguments on social media including X are down to timeframe.
While this is true, there are also different methods used:
1. Trend following - most popular by far
2. Mean reversion (the camp I fall in) - go in early and go in hard
3. Secular vs Business cycle vs Astrology vs Sentiment vs 4 year vs 'insert any other type of cycle'
Most traders follow number 1. Most consumers also favour those who post about number 1. Therefore it becomes self-reinforcing... anyone who talks in terms of number 2 or 3 is very likely to get crucified often.
At the end of the day the o

Just like many people wanted cycle end during Q4 2025, most are just shifting to one last pump in 2026 to 150k.
Fade. Fade. Fade. Tell me you have 2021 PTSD without telling me you have 2021 PTSD.

Noticed that the accounts with longer time horizons end up with less followers. The lower the timeframe analysis, the more followers.
...which is strange, given how most people on this app claim to be investors, not traders.
---
Do people follow these trader accounts because they have more followers, and therefore unknowingly end up having trader mindsets, leading to failure (as it wont fit their goals/methods/lifestyle).
Or is it people having too much time on their hands, so they need to hyperfocus on every tick, and thereby missing the bigger picture, and not knowing what to do when the tim

Local bottoms during bear markets don't consolidate for 6-8 weeks.
They bounce aggressively and consolidate below resistance while ditribution takes place.
Local bottoms during bull markets DO consolidate for 6-8 weeks (like we just had).

Only people that look at stocks are bullish beyond the first half of 2026.
The world doesn't revolve around bitcoin and crypto. It's the other way around.
Unless this time is different? I don't think so.