Why does the price drop whenever you buy altcoins? Revealing the market maker quoting mechanism—it's not "whales targeting you" after all.

ChainNewsAbmedia

Many crypto investors have experienced a similar situation: a certain altcoin seems to be about to break out, and as soon as they buy in, the price immediately reverses downward, as if the market is “targeting your trades.” This phenomenon is especially common among small-cap coins, leading to the saying that they are “being targeted by market makers.”

But is this really the case? In fact, price reversals are not necessarily due to subjective manipulation but stem from the risk management behaviors of market makers under specific models.

The Crypto Club at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST Crypto Club), led by President Dave, recently published a long post on X (account: @bc1qDave), systematically analyzing this long-standing market phenomenon that troubles retail investors from the perspective of market microstructure and quantitative models.

In the article, Dave points out that such price reversals are mostly not the so-called “market makers targeting retail investors” or subjective manipulation. Instead, they originate from market makers’ automated quoting adjustments based on the Avellaneda–Stoikov market-making model, considering inventory risk and toxic order flow. In other words, retail traders’ transactions often already alter the market’s risk pricing.

Market Makers Are Not Betting on Direction, They Are Managing Risk

Unlike typical investors, market makers do not profit from predicting price movements. Instead, they earn stable income through bid-ask spreads and quotes. Ideally, market makers maintain their inventory close to neutral, minimizing the impact of price fluctuations on overall PnL.

However, when the market experiences a large influx of buy or sell orders, this balance is disrupted.

You buy heavily

Equivalent to market makers selling heavily

Market maker inventory becomes “short exposure”

At this point, the inventory itself becomes a source of risk.

Mechanism 1|Quote Skew: Why Do Prices Move in the Opposite Direction?

When market makers take on excessive short positions due to retail investors’ large buy orders, they have two core objectives:

  • Quickly rebalance their inventory

  • Protect their existing short positions from adverse price movements

Therefore, market makers will proactively lower their quotes to attract sell orders and suppress further buy orders. To investors, this behavior appears as “when I buy, the price drops.”

In reality, this is not targeted at individuals but the result of automatic quote adjustments in the system.

Mechanism 2|Widening Spreads: Why Trading Becomes Difficult

If the inventory imbalance worsens further, market makers will also:

  • Widen the bid-ask spread

  • Reduce trading frequency

The purpose of this is to lower the risk undertaken per unit time and offset potential price losses through higher spreads.

The Core Concept Behind the Math: Reservation Price

In the market-making model, the actual transaction price for retail traders is called the Reservation Price, simplified as:

Reservation Price = Mid Price − γ × q

q: Market maker’s current inventory

γ (gamma): Risk aversion coefficient

When retail traders place concentrated orders, causing rapid inventory changes, the Reservation Price adjusts accordingly, influencing market quotes.

According to the Avellaneda–Stoikov model:

  • The optimal quote revolves around the Reservation Price

  • Inventory exhibits mean-reversion characteristics

  • Spreads widen as risk increases

In simple terms: your trading flow changes the market’s risk pricing.

Why Are Retail Investors Especially Prone to “Water Reversal”?

Compared to institutional and professional traders, retail investors often have the following characteristics:

  • Almost all active orders

  • Concentrated order sizes

  • Transparent, non-sliced orders

  • No hedging mechanisms

In highly liquid mainstream coins, these effects may be offset by other trading pairs; but in small altcoins, your orders are often the main market signals in a short period.

In other words, in small-cap markets, you are very likely to directly become the counterparty to market makers.

What Is the True Objective Function of Market Makers?

Rather than aiming to “beat up retail investors,” market makers pursue the maximization of:

  • Spread profit − Inventory risk − Adverse selection risk

Among these, inventory risk is often incorporated as an “exponential penalty,” which explains why their quote adjustments are so swift and decisive.

Practical Tips for Retail Investors: Reverse Exploiting the Quote Mechanism

Once you understand the market makers’ quoting logic, you can also leverage it slightly.

For example, if you want to establish a 1000 USDT long position:

  • Do not buy all at once

  • Start with a small amount, e.g., 100 USDT

  • Gradually add to your position as the quote system lowers prices

By entering in batches, your average cost basis is often lower than a single all-in buy.

To Be Continued | Toxic Order Flow Is the Other Half of the Truth

This article only reveals one reason for price divergence—inventory-driven quoting mechanisms. Another key factor is how market makers identify and defend against “toxic order flow.”

In the next article, Dave will delve into:

  • How market makers analyze order books

  • What types of trades are considered “toxic”

  • The microstructure causes of certain extreme market events

This article, “Why Does Buying Altcoins Always Lead to Price Drops? Unveiling Market Maker Quoting Mechanisms—It’s Not ‘Market Makers Targeting You’,” originally appeared on Chain News ABMedia.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Dogecoin Slides Despite Elon Musk Reviving DogeFather Persona

Key Insights Elon Musk’s DogeFather post sparked attention, yet Dogecoin’s price declined, showing limited market reaction despite strong social media engagement and renewed community discussion. Dogecoin traded near $0.093 after a failed recovery attempt, with steady volume and moderate

CryptoFrontNews6m ago

Bittensor Holds Strength but Faces Resistance Near $285 Level

Key Insights: Bittensor maintains strong short-term momentum above key averages, while ETF developments and high staking levels continue shaping liquidity and investor demand dynamics. Overbought technical indicators signal stretched conditions, even as bullish momentum persists,

CryptoFrontNews12m ago

Hyperliquid Price Jumps 22% as Commodity Trading Hits Record

Key Insights: Hyperliquid surged over 20% weekly, driven by record commodity futures trading volumes, especially oil and silver contracts, gaining strong traction among traders. Whale activity surpassed $3.6 billion in leveraged positions, boosting liquidity and reinforcing upward momentum a

CryptoFrontNews16m ago

Weekly Report: Gold Breaks Below $4,500! Crude Oil Surges Past $110, But Bitcoin Rallies and Outperforms Gold

Escalating tensions in the Middle East and the Federal Reserve's hawkish stance have impacted global financial markets. Gold plummeted more than 10% this week, marking its worst performance since 1983, while oil prices surged to historic highs. In contrast, Bitcoin rose against the trend, indicating a flow of capital toward crypto assets. The market continues to face uncertainty, and volatility in risk assets may persist.

動區BlockTempo1h ago

Bitcoin dips back below $75,000 on the eve of the Federal Reserve decision

Bitcoin recently touched $75,000 but failed to sustain the level, pulling back to $74,000, reflecting cautious sentiment among investors ahead of the upcoming Federal Reserve interest rate decision. Geopolitical risks and elevated energy prices have driven inflation higher, affecting market expectations for rate cuts and pushing the timeline for cuts to year-end. Technical analysis shows Bitcoin remains strong but has not confirmed a decisive breakout above the $75,000 level, with limited upside potential in the near term.

区块客2h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments