2026-01-07 10:00:10

#数字资产行情上升 Mainstream cryptocurrencies continue to strengthen, with $BTC, $ETH, and $BNB performing especially attention-grabbing. Market sentiment is clearly warming up, and many analysts are optimistic about Ethereum continuing upward, with a target of 8500 in the short term. Will this rebound continue? It depends on whether it can hold steady above key support levels. Currently, the coordination between Bitcoin and secondary coins is quite good, with trading volume gradually increasing. In the short term, focus on whether it can break through previous resistance levels, and in the medium term, observe changes in institutional participation.

BTC0,24%

ETH-0,77%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkMonger

· 01-08 08:48

nah, all this "institutional participation" talk is just cope. ethereum's governance is too flawed to hold 8500 anyway – watch how fast those support levels crumble when the next protocol vulnerability drops. real players aren't watching pressure points, they're mapping exit liquidity.

Reply0

GraphGuru

· 01-07 10:24

Is Bitcoin about to take off again? The key is that the volume must keep up; otherwise, it will be a fleeting moment again.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-07 10:22

8500 again? You said the same last time, and what was the result...

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-07 10:03

The 8500 target level is a bit conservative. If the market really starts to rise, we might need to look higher.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-07 10:00

The data shows that, from a technical perspective, the sustainability of this rebound largely depends on the level of institutional participation. The 8500 target is indeed significant, but don't forget the repetitive nature of historical resistance levels.

View OriginalReply0