Bipartisan Bill Seeks To Shield Blockchain Developers From Criminal Liability

DEFI-17,67%
  • New bill protects non-custodial developers from unfair prosecution.
  • Clarifies that Section 1960 applies only to those who control customer funds.
  • Bill draws a line between coders and money transmitters.
  • Backers say it safeguards U.S. crypto innovation.

US lawmakers have introduced the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026 to protect software developers from criminal prosecution. The measure, which aims to draw a boundary between entities that control user funds and those who merely write code, includes a provision that the DeFi sector has long pressed for to be part of the CLARITY Act

Drawing the Line Between Developers and Money Transmitters

On Friday, Reps. Scott Fitzgerald, Zoe Lofgren, and Ben Cline introduced the novel bill to block the prosecution of software developers who write code, as opposed to those who hold and transmit customers’ assets. The legislation clarifies that Section 1960 of the Criminal Code only applies to developers who handle funds

It applies to individuals or entities that transfer funds on behalf of others without proper state licenses or that fail to comply with federal registration requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) obligations. The law is commonly used to prosecute illegal money transmission schemes, including those involving digital assets, when operators are found to be moving or controlling customer funds without authorization.

ADVERTISEMENTSection 1960 refers to 18 U.S.C. § 1960 of the federal criminal code, which classifies as criminal activity the operation of unlicensed money transmitting businesses. It makes it unlawful for anyone or any entity to transfer funds for others without the requisite state licenses and federal compliance requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) provisions

Authorities often invoke the provision to pursue unlawful money transmission schemes, including crypto-related cases, where individuals are accused of holding or moving customer funds without regulatory clearance.

The bill presents regulatory clarity to the debate of whether non-custodial developers should be prosecuted the same way as custodial actors. It aligns with the initial intent of Section 1960 and represents Congressional and judicial consensus on the matter

ADVERTISEMENT## Protecting Innovation While Targeting Criminal Activity

While section 1960 originally applied to custodial developers, the cases of Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet, where the law was applied to developers who wrote only code, necessitated the clear boundaries the bill establishes.

“For too long,” said Rep. Cline, “federal overreach has blurred the line between bad actors and the innovators building next-generation technology.”

“This bipartisan bill restores needed clarity by protecting developers who don’t control customer funds, while ensuring law enforcement can continue to target real criminals. I’m proud to support this effort to keep America the global leader in blockchain innovation.”

Over the past few years, experts raised an alarm over a massive outflow of American developers to other jurisdictions due to the fear of unfair prosecution. Once the new legislation gets passed, it will ensure the protection of these non-custodial developers, and by extension, secure the future of American leadership in the digital asset space.

ADVERTISEMENT

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

U.S. Tax Day: Bitcoin Daily Payments Involve Hundreds of Pages of Filing Documents

A report from the Cato Institute states that the United States requires reporting capital gains tax for every Bitcoin transaction, which would increase the reporting burden. The report recommends either eliminating the capital gains tax or raising the exemption threshold in the “Virtual Currency Tax Fairness Act” to about $80k to ease the tax burden on small transactions.

MarketWhisper1h ago

Gate Daily Report (April 16): Tether may have purchased 951 BTC; Virginia enacts crypto property law

Bitcoin continues to rise, reaching $74,630. Tether uses its profits to buy 951 bitcoins. Virginia passes an unclaimed property law, requiring idle cryptocurrency to be transferred to the state government. U.S. stocks are driven by tech stocks, and the S&P 500 index hits a new high. Crypto market dynamics show that investors are paying attention to geopolitical conditions and U.S. monetary policy.

MarketWhisper2h ago

Kalshi Launches Parental Portal and AI Verification to Combat Underage Misuse of Prediction Market

Kalshi is introducing a parental portal for identity verification and selfie authentication to prevent minors from bypassing age restrictions. This follows scrutiny over its compliance with prediction market regulations amid ongoing lawsuits.

GateNews3h ago

Pakistan Lifts an Eight-Year Ban: Central Bank Allows Banks to Serve Crypto Businesses, and the Virtual Assets Law Takes Effect

On April 14, 2026, the State Bank of Pakistan lifted its crypto-assets banking ban that has been in place since 2018, officially kicking off the Virtual Assets Act 2026. Banks may open accounts for licensed virtual asset service providers, but must establish a segregation-of-funds mechanism to ensure that customers’ funds are not affected. This policy change responds to domestic demand and demonstrates Pakistan’s growing role on the international stage.

ChainNewsAbmedia12h ago

The central bank issues a digital currency report—does it directly refute Qu Bo? If Taiwan issues a CBDC, merchants generally cannot refuse to accept it

The central bank released a report stating that Taiwan’s CBDC development will follow a phased promotion strategy. In the short term, it is not urgent to issue retail CBDC; the focus is on wholesale CBDC and the infrastructure for asset tokenization. The central bank emphasized that CBDC will not increase the money supply and will have legal standing. As a rule, merchants may not refuse to accept it, in order to prevent the payment market from becoming overly dependent on the private sector.

ChainNewsAbmedia14h ago

White House Report Challenges Stablecoin Yield Ban, CLARITY Act Advances in Senate

A White House report argues against banning stablecoin yields, highlighting minimal benefits for bank lending and reduced consumer earnings. Key officials support the CLARITY Act, but the Senate Banking Committee's timeline remains uncertain, affecting the bill's chances before summer recess.

GateNews16h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments