Have you ever wondered why prices are listed in dollars, euros or yuan instead of some other way? The answer lies in a fundamental economic concept called a unit of account. Whether you’re buying groceries, investing in property, or comparing salaries across countries, you’re relying on a unit of account—the standard measure that lets you assess and compare the value of everything from a coffee to a house.
A unit of account is essentially the measuring stick of an economy. It’s what establishes the common language through which all goods and services get priced, and it enables you to make meaningful comparisons between completely different things. Without it, commerce would become nearly impossible.
Why Every Economy Needs a Unit of Account
Every country operates with its own unit of account, typically aligned with its national currency. The American economy measures everything in U.S. dollars, China uses the yuan, the Eurozone employs the euro, and the United Kingdom uses the pound sterling. Globally, the U.S. dollar functions as the de facto unit of account for international trade and pricing, simplifying transactions between nations and making it easier to compare economic performance across different regions.
The role of a unit of account extends far beyond simple price tags. It’s fundamentally what allows the financial system to function. Banks calculate interest rates in the unit of account. Governments measure national GDP in their designated currency. Businesses track profit and loss, inventory value and accounts receivable—all expressed in the same unit of account. When everything operates in the same measurement system, comparing two different assets or making sound financial decisions becomes straightforward.
Consider a practical example: without a unit of account, how would you decide whether to buy a car or a house? You’d need to somehow measure one against the other without any common standard. With a unit of account, you simply compare their prices—say $30,000 for the car versus $300,000 for the house—and immediately understand the relative values. This common denominator makes budgeting, financial planning and economic calculation possible.
The Essential Properties That Define a Unit of Account
For something to function effectively as a unit of account, it must possess specific characteristics. The first is divisibility—the ability to be broken down into smaller, equal units. Money must be divisible so you can express the value of items at any price point, from a penny item to a billion-dollar asset. Without divisibility, you’d be forced to buy or sell only in fixed, whole quantities, which would be economically inefficient.
The second critical property is fungibility. This means that one unit of the measure is identical to another unit of the same measure. One dollar bill has exactly the same value and function as another dollar bill. They’re completely interchangeable. This interchangeability is essential because it allows the unit of account to maintain consistent meaning. If dollar bills varied in value depending on which one you held, the measurement system would collapse.
Together, divisibility and fungibility create a stable, practical measurement system. They allow prices to be set with precision and enable millions of economic transactions to occur with shared understanding about what values mean.
The Inflation Problem: When Your Unit of Account Becomes Unreliable
Here’s where things get complicated. A unit of account doesn’t just need to work today—it needs to maintain its meaning over time. Yet most traditional currencies suffer from inflation, which gradually erodes purchasing power. When inflation runs high, the unit of account becomes less reliable for comparing values across different time periods.
Think about this: if you were promised $100 in five years, that sounds nice—until inflation eats away 30% of its purchasing power. Suddenly, that $100 buys much less than today’s $100. This instability makes it harder for businesses to make long-term investments, for savers to plan for retirement, and for economists to accurately track real economic value versus just nominal values.
Inflation essentially breaks the unit of account’s promise to be a consistent measure. When prices keep rising, comparing the value of goods and services over time becomes increasingly difficult and misleading. Market participants struggle to distinguish between real growth and merely nominal price changes, leading to poor investment and consumption decisions.
What Would Make a Perfect Unit of Account?
Ideally, an effective unit of account would be divisible, fungible, and insulated from inflation. If you could design a currency that maintained its purchasing power, it would serve as a far more reliable measuring stick for value. Imagine if a unit of account worked like the metric system—standardized, consistent, and predictable across time and geography.
The challenge is that value itself is subjective and constantly shifting. Economic conditions change, technological innovation disrupts industries, population dynamics shift, and global circumstances evolve. So there’s no guarantee that any single measure can remain perfectly stable forever. However, we can get closer to this ideal by adopting a unit of account with predetermined, inelastic supply that isn’t subject to the whims of central banks or government monetary policy.
Bitcoin: A New Model for Unit of Account
This is where Bitcoin enters the conversation. Bitcoin operates with a fixed maximum supply of 21 million coins. This predetermined cap means Bitcoin isn’t subject to the same unlimited money-printing that affects government-issued fiat currencies. Central banks can issue currency ad infinitum when they choose to stimulate the economy or fund spending. Bitcoin cannot—its scarcity is built into its code.
For businesses and individuals, this creates a meaningful advantage. If Bitcoin ever achieved widespread adoption as a unit of account, it would provide unprecedented predictability and certainty. Instead of wondering whether inflation will erode their savings or make long-term contracts unreliable, people could lock in value with confidence. This would make financial planning more trustworthy and reduce the economic uncertainty that inflation creates.
Moreover, if governments couldn’t simply print money to fund initiatives, they’d be forced to make harder choices about resource allocation. Policymakers would need to prioritize innovation, productivity improvements and genuine investment rather than relying on currency debasement to fund spending. This could reshape economic incentives entirely.
On the international stage, adopting Bitcoin as a global unit of account would eliminate currency exchange friction. Businesses and individuals wouldn’t need to convert between dollars, euros, yuan and other currencies, reducing transaction costs and currency fluctuation risks. Cross-border trade would become simpler and cheaper, potentially unlocking new economic cooperation and growth opportunities worldwide.
The Path Forward
Bitcoin still faces significant hurdles before it could become a universal unit of account. It’s a relatively young technology with high price volatility and limited infrastructure. For Bitcoin to function as a reliable unit of account, it would need to achieve broader global acceptance, demonstrate sustained price stability, and integrate into financial systems and commerce at scale.
Yet the underlying concept is powerful: a unit of account that can’t be inflated away, that’s censorship-resistant, and that operates on a global network could represent a genuine advance for economic stability and fair financial measurement. Whether Bitcoin itself becomes that standard or whether another technology fills this role, the principle remains compelling—an incorruptible, stable, universally recognized measure of value would transform how economies function and how individuals plan their financial futures.
The views expressed here represent a perspective on monetary economics and are not intended as financial advice.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Understanding What a Unit of Account Really Is
Have you ever wondered why prices are listed in dollars, euros or yuan instead of some other way? The answer lies in a fundamental economic concept called a unit of account. Whether you’re buying groceries, investing in property, or comparing salaries across countries, you’re relying on a unit of account—the standard measure that lets you assess and compare the value of everything from a coffee to a house.
A unit of account is essentially the measuring stick of an economy. It’s what establishes the common language through which all goods and services get priced, and it enables you to make meaningful comparisons between completely different things. Without it, commerce would become nearly impossible.
Why Every Economy Needs a Unit of Account
Every country operates with its own unit of account, typically aligned with its national currency. The American economy measures everything in U.S. dollars, China uses the yuan, the Eurozone employs the euro, and the United Kingdom uses the pound sterling. Globally, the U.S. dollar functions as the de facto unit of account for international trade and pricing, simplifying transactions between nations and making it easier to compare economic performance across different regions.
The role of a unit of account extends far beyond simple price tags. It’s fundamentally what allows the financial system to function. Banks calculate interest rates in the unit of account. Governments measure national GDP in their designated currency. Businesses track profit and loss, inventory value and accounts receivable—all expressed in the same unit of account. When everything operates in the same measurement system, comparing two different assets or making sound financial decisions becomes straightforward.
Consider a practical example: without a unit of account, how would you decide whether to buy a car or a house? You’d need to somehow measure one against the other without any common standard. With a unit of account, you simply compare their prices—say $30,000 for the car versus $300,000 for the house—and immediately understand the relative values. This common denominator makes budgeting, financial planning and economic calculation possible.
The Essential Properties That Define a Unit of Account
For something to function effectively as a unit of account, it must possess specific characteristics. The first is divisibility—the ability to be broken down into smaller, equal units. Money must be divisible so you can express the value of items at any price point, from a penny item to a billion-dollar asset. Without divisibility, you’d be forced to buy or sell only in fixed, whole quantities, which would be economically inefficient.
The second critical property is fungibility. This means that one unit of the measure is identical to another unit of the same measure. One dollar bill has exactly the same value and function as another dollar bill. They’re completely interchangeable. This interchangeability is essential because it allows the unit of account to maintain consistent meaning. If dollar bills varied in value depending on which one you held, the measurement system would collapse.
Together, divisibility and fungibility create a stable, practical measurement system. They allow prices to be set with precision and enable millions of economic transactions to occur with shared understanding about what values mean.
The Inflation Problem: When Your Unit of Account Becomes Unreliable
Here’s where things get complicated. A unit of account doesn’t just need to work today—it needs to maintain its meaning over time. Yet most traditional currencies suffer from inflation, which gradually erodes purchasing power. When inflation runs high, the unit of account becomes less reliable for comparing values across different time periods.
Think about this: if you were promised $100 in five years, that sounds nice—until inflation eats away 30% of its purchasing power. Suddenly, that $100 buys much less than today’s $100. This instability makes it harder for businesses to make long-term investments, for savers to plan for retirement, and for economists to accurately track real economic value versus just nominal values.
Inflation essentially breaks the unit of account’s promise to be a consistent measure. When prices keep rising, comparing the value of goods and services over time becomes increasingly difficult and misleading. Market participants struggle to distinguish between real growth and merely nominal price changes, leading to poor investment and consumption decisions.
What Would Make a Perfect Unit of Account?
Ideally, an effective unit of account would be divisible, fungible, and insulated from inflation. If you could design a currency that maintained its purchasing power, it would serve as a far more reliable measuring stick for value. Imagine if a unit of account worked like the metric system—standardized, consistent, and predictable across time and geography.
The challenge is that value itself is subjective and constantly shifting. Economic conditions change, technological innovation disrupts industries, population dynamics shift, and global circumstances evolve. So there’s no guarantee that any single measure can remain perfectly stable forever. However, we can get closer to this ideal by adopting a unit of account with predetermined, inelastic supply that isn’t subject to the whims of central banks or government monetary policy.
Bitcoin: A New Model for Unit of Account
This is where Bitcoin enters the conversation. Bitcoin operates with a fixed maximum supply of 21 million coins. This predetermined cap means Bitcoin isn’t subject to the same unlimited money-printing that affects government-issued fiat currencies. Central banks can issue currency ad infinitum when they choose to stimulate the economy or fund spending. Bitcoin cannot—its scarcity is built into its code.
For businesses and individuals, this creates a meaningful advantage. If Bitcoin ever achieved widespread adoption as a unit of account, it would provide unprecedented predictability and certainty. Instead of wondering whether inflation will erode their savings or make long-term contracts unreliable, people could lock in value with confidence. This would make financial planning more trustworthy and reduce the economic uncertainty that inflation creates.
Moreover, if governments couldn’t simply print money to fund initiatives, they’d be forced to make harder choices about resource allocation. Policymakers would need to prioritize innovation, productivity improvements and genuine investment rather than relying on currency debasement to fund spending. This could reshape economic incentives entirely.
On the international stage, adopting Bitcoin as a global unit of account would eliminate currency exchange friction. Businesses and individuals wouldn’t need to convert between dollars, euros, yuan and other currencies, reducing transaction costs and currency fluctuation risks. Cross-border trade would become simpler and cheaper, potentially unlocking new economic cooperation and growth opportunities worldwide.
The Path Forward
Bitcoin still faces significant hurdles before it could become a universal unit of account. It’s a relatively young technology with high price volatility and limited infrastructure. For Bitcoin to function as a reliable unit of account, it would need to achieve broader global acceptance, demonstrate sustained price stability, and integrate into financial systems and commerce at scale.
Yet the underlying concept is powerful: a unit of account that can’t be inflated away, that’s censorship-resistant, and that operates on a global network could represent a genuine advance for economic stability and fair financial measurement. Whether Bitcoin itself becomes that standard or whether another technology fills this role, the principle remains compelling—an incorruptible, stable, universally recognized measure of value would transform how economies function and how individuals plan their financial futures.
The views expressed here represent a perspective on monetary economics and are not intended as financial advice.