I've been watching @Nirvana_Fi for a while. Samsara's launch this time appears low-key on the surface, but in fact it's a pretty hardcore move within the Solana $SOL ecosystem.
The core of Nirvana's Samsara is to enable project teams to directly create DATs (Digital Asset Treasuries) on-chain. Simply put, it's a fully on-chain treasury model built on Solana, in the style of “MicroStrategy.” What attracts me most isn't that it's another “launch platform,” but the built-in “floor mechanism.” It doesn't rely on storytelling to pump prices, nor on infinite mining dilution, nor on market sentiment gambling — it allows project teams to design a transparent, programmable, and visible asset backing logic themselves. Everything is on-chain: where the money went, how it appreciates, when buybacks are triggered — all are publicly verifiable. This approach, to some extent, is pushing projects to shift from “short-term storytelling” to “long-term value anchoring.” Treasuries are no longer black boxes or just marketing talk; they are real on-chain financial infrastructure. If Solana wants to retain teams that truly want to do big things and funds that want to invest long-term, these kinds of “primitives” are key. Speed is just the entry ticket; the real differentiator is the sustainability and auditability of tokenomics. Once DATs are operational, they could reshape how on-chain projects manage funds and how they give confidence to holders. It’s not just a cherry on top — it’s a fundamental change in underlying logic. As someone developing on Solana and observing investments, I personally think Samsara is worth paying close attention to — don’t just see it as a regular launchpad and dismiss it. Link is here: Would love to hear everyone’s thoughts — Is the floor mechanism difficult to implement? Can DATs really turn project treasuries from “spending on marketing” to “self-sustaining”? Or is this just another beautiful-sounding but hard-to-implement ideal model? Let’s discuss. My stance first: the mechanism design is really clever, but whether it succeeds depends on whether the first projects to use it dare to go all-in.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
I've been watching @Nirvana_Fi for a while. Samsara's launch this time appears low-key on the surface, but in fact it's a pretty hardcore move within the Solana $SOL ecosystem.
The core of Nirvana's Samsara is to enable project teams to directly create DATs (Digital Asset Treasuries) on-chain. Simply put, it's a fully on-chain treasury model built on Solana, in the style of “MicroStrategy.”
What attracts me most isn't that it's another “launch platform,” but the built-in “floor mechanism.” It doesn't rely on storytelling to pump prices, nor on infinite mining dilution, nor on market sentiment gambling — it allows project teams to design a transparent, programmable, and visible asset backing logic themselves.
Everything is on-chain: where the money went, how it appreciates, when buybacks are triggered — all are publicly verifiable. This approach, to some extent, is pushing projects to shift from “short-term storytelling” to “long-term value anchoring.”
Treasuries are no longer black boxes or just marketing talk; they are real on-chain financial infrastructure. If Solana wants to retain teams that truly want to do big things and funds that want to invest long-term, these kinds of “primitives” are key. Speed is just the entry ticket; the real differentiator is the sustainability and auditability of tokenomics.
Once DATs are operational, they could reshape how on-chain projects manage funds and how they give confidence to holders. It’s not just a cherry on top — it’s a fundamental change in underlying logic.
As someone developing on Solana and observing investments, I personally think Samsara is worth paying close attention to — don’t just see it as a regular launchpad and dismiss it.
Link is here:
Would love to hear everyone’s thoughts —
Is the floor mechanism difficult to implement?
Can DATs really turn project treasuries from “spending on marketing” to “self-sustaining”?
Or is this just another beautiful-sounding but hard-to-implement ideal model?
Let’s discuss. My stance first: the mechanism design is really clever, but whether it succeeds depends on whether the first projects to use it dare to go all-in.