Don't be fooled by manufacturers' grand promises! Let's talk about the deadly flaws of "blockchain phones"
Recently, blockchain phones have become popular again. From Samsung and HTC to Solana, various players are rushing into the market, but if you actually spend money on one, you'll probably find—it's completely different from what you imagined.
You think it's a "cryptographic vault," but in reality, it's just a "high-priced leek machine"
Many people order based on lofty claims like "security chip" and "dedicated wallet," believing their assets will be impregnable from now on. But the reality is, these new chips' security models have not stood the test of time. In the history of encryption, too many "brand-new solutions" have been exposed to have fatal backdoors after a year or two. Do you dare to bet your entire fortune on a "new thing" that hasn't been proven in long-term practical use?
What's more ironic is that many blockchain phones, to showcase their status, have huge brand logos or Bitcoin symbols printed on them. To knowledgeable people, this is no different from having "Come and rob me, there's money here" pasted on your forehead. True security, on the other hand, requires "not exposing wealth," and the more ordinary the appearance, the better.
Users don't want a "phone that can hold a wallet," but a "phone that dares to hold a wallet"
Currently, most blockchain phones are limited to "pre-installed a few DApps" and "support a few chains." Essentially, this is no different from downloading apps on a regular phone. The real pain points for users are often ignored by manufacturers.
For example: when traveling to high-risk areas, do you have to delete dozens of exchange and wallet apps every time? Can you hide all crypto-related apps with one click, or even set up two completely isolated system interfaces? Also, how many people have accidentally screenshot their seed phrases and stored them in photo albums, even syncing to the cloud? Can the system intelligently detect and prevent such high-risk operations? These are the "survival issues" that crypto users face daily in the real world.
Airdrops can recoup costs, but can't retain users
Undeniably, many people buy blockchain phones for airdrop rewards. But this is essentially "burning money to attract users," not product strength. Once the incentives stop, users immediately leave. A phone that can't establish real usage habits is doomed to be just a transitional speculative product.
The future belongs to "invisible guardians," not "high-profile mascots"
The ultimate fate of blockchain phones is unlikely to be becoming an independent category. When giants like Apple and Samsung incorporate system-level wallets and hardware-level encryption as standard features, these functions will silently integrate into every phone. What you need isn't a phone that looks "very encrypted," but one that feels "very secure" in use—its appearance is ordinary, but it can protect your assets at critical moments.
True disruption might happen on a different track
Interestingly, while blockchain phones are still stuck on "pre-installed wallets," AI phones have quietly taken a bolder step. Products like "Doubao Phone" give AI direct control over the screen, helping you order takeout automatically, complete tasks, or even play games. This is a level of innovation that touches on "human-computer interaction redefinition."
Comparing the two, the difference is clear: one is stuck in old narratives, rehashing the same concepts, while the other is redefining what a phone can do. So, don't just focus on those hype concept phones related to cryptocurrencies. The next phone that truly changes your life might not even mention "blockchain" at all.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Don't be fooled by manufacturers' grand promises! Let's talk about the deadly flaws of "blockchain phones"
Recently, blockchain phones have become popular again. From Samsung and HTC to Solana, various players are rushing into the market, but if you actually spend money on one, you'll probably find—it's completely different from what you imagined.
You think it's a "cryptographic vault," but in reality, it's just a "high-priced leek machine"
Many people order based on lofty claims like "security chip" and "dedicated wallet," believing their assets will be impregnable from now on. But the reality is, these new chips' security models have not stood the test of time. In the history of encryption, too many "brand-new solutions" have been exposed to have fatal backdoors after a year or two. Do you dare to bet your entire fortune on a "new thing" that hasn't been proven in long-term practical use?
What's more ironic is that many blockchain phones, to showcase their status, have huge brand logos or Bitcoin symbols printed on them. To knowledgeable people, this is no different from having "Come and rob me, there's money here" pasted on your forehead. True security, on the other hand, requires "not exposing wealth," and the more ordinary the appearance, the better.
Users don't want a "phone that can hold a wallet," but a "phone that dares to hold a wallet"
Currently, most blockchain phones are limited to "pre-installed a few DApps" and "support a few chains." Essentially, this is no different from downloading apps on a regular phone. The real pain points for users are often ignored by manufacturers.
For example: when traveling to high-risk areas, do you have to delete dozens of exchange and wallet apps every time? Can you hide all crypto-related apps with one click, or even set up two completely isolated system interfaces? Also, how many people have accidentally screenshot their seed phrases and stored them in photo albums, even syncing to the cloud? Can the system intelligently detect and prevent such high-risk operations? These are the "survival issues" that crypto users face daily in the real world.
Airdrops can recoup costs, but can't retain users
Undeniably, many people buy blockchain phones for airdrop rewards. But this is essentially "burning money to attract users," not product strength. Once the incentives stop, users immediately leave. A phone that can't establish real usage habits is doomed to be just a transitional speculative product.
The future belongs to "invisible guardians," not "high-profile mascots"
The ultimate fate of blockchain phones is unlikely to be becoming an independent category. When giants like Apple and Samsung incorporate system-level wallets and hardware-level encryption as standard features, these functions will silently integrate into every phone. What you need isn't a phone that looks "very encrypted," but one that feels "very secure" in use—its appearance is ordinary, but it can protect your assets at critical moments.
True disruption might happen on a different track
Interestingly, while blockchain phones are still stuck on "pre-installed wallets," AI phones have quietly taken a bolder step. Products like "Doubao Phone" give AI direct control over the screen, helping you order takeout automatically, complete tasks, or even play games. This is a level of innovation that touches on "human-computer interaction redefinition."
Comparing the two, the difference is clear: one is stuck in old narratives, rehashing the same concepts, while the other is redefining what a phone can do. So, don't just focus on those hype concept phones related to cryptocurrencies. The next phone that truly changes your life might not even mention "blockchain" at all.