Last year, the Ethereum network demonstrated remarkable progress in infrastructure and institutional adoption. However, this achievement is not reflected in the ETH price, which created a significant disconnect between ecosystem fundamentals and market performance. For investors who bought ETH at the beginning of 2025, this year has been filled with hope that turned into disillusionment, with unrealized losses reaching 15% or more.
Changes in Ethereum Investment Standards
The biggest change in 2025 is not about price but how the market perceives Ethereum. In previous years, Ethereum investment remained exclusive to blockchain enthusiasts and traders. But this year has brought a paradigm shift in that regard.
The first signal came from the ETF market. From June 1 to September 30, inflows into Ethereum ETFs exceeded $10 billion—approximately five times higher than in the first half of the year. This ETF infrastructure has actually opened the door for retail investors who never considered Ethereum as an investment vehicle.
At the same time, corporate treasury strategies focused on ETH have become a hot topic. Unlike Bitcoin treasuries, which are simply asset holdings, ETH treasuries offer an additional generating mechanism: staking rewards. Discovering this edge has inspired well-known companies to allocate significant ETH positions on their balance sheets.
Currently, the five leading companies with the largest Ethereum holdings hold a combined 5.56 million ETH, representing over 4.6% of the total supply, with a current valuation exceeding $16 billion dollars. These figures demonstrate the substantial inflow of institutional capital into the Ethereum ecosystem this year.
The Standard of Success for Ethereum Infrastructure
If we measure Ethereum using traditional price appreciation standards, the results are disappointing. ETH reached an all-time high of $4,953 in August but did not stay there and fell back to lower levels in the following months. Currently, the price is $3,100, showing significant volatility and underperformance.
However, if we change the standard and look at blockchain infrastructure maturity, the picture is quite different. The two major technical upgrades—Pectra and Fusaka—addressed critical network challenges that the ecosystem had long awaited.
The Pectra upgrade, launched in May, expanded data sharding capabilities and provided larger compressed data storage for Layer 2 networks. The result was a significant reduction in transaction costs and faster confirmation times. The Fusaka upgrade further optimized scalability and user experience.
These technical improvements directly support Ethereum’s primary use cases: settlement layer for stablecoin transactions and platform for tokenized real-world assets (RWA). As of writing, Ethereum-based tokenized assets still account for more than half of the global tokenized asset value.
The Hidden True Value
The disconnect between Ethereum network success and ETH price performance reflects a fundamental truth about crypto markets: market attention and token appreciation do not always move in tandem.
Ethereum’s stablecoin ecosystem continues to grow and has become the backbone of on-chain financial activities. Tokenization of real-world assets on Ethereum—from corporate bonds to real estate—provides tangible use cases beyond speculation.
The institutional adoption pathway—through ETFs and corporate treasury structures—has transformed Ethereum from a niche blockchain asset into a mainstream portfolio allocation. On-chain governance, compliance frameworks, and regular financial disclosures have become possible because of Ethereum’s reliability and transparency.
These developments suggest that the long-term success standard for Ethereum should be oriented toward ecosystem utility and institutional integration, not just short-term price movements.
Looking to 2026
For those following the Ethereum roadmap, 2025 is seen as a transition year—from a pure speculation asset to the infrastructure backbone of the emerging on-chain financial system.
The challenge now is how to bridge this disconnect. The Ethereum ecosystem has proven to be technically sound and institutionally viable. The question is when market attention will convert ecosystem momentum into sustained token price appreciation.
In the short term, price volatility is likely to continue due to broader market cycles and macro factors. But fundamentally, Ethereum’s achievements in 2025—from technical upgrades to institutional framework development—have laid a solid foundation for sustainable long-term growth.
The lesson for 2025 is clear: Ethereum network success and ETH token price are operating under different standards this year. The first is reaching institutional acceptance and infrastructure maturity. The second remains at the mercy of broader market sentiment. The convergence of the two is not guaranteed, but the groundwork for it has already been laid.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Ethereum 2025: A Growing Ecosystem, but Token Price is Lagging
Last year, the Ethereum network demonstrated remarkable progress in infrastructure and institutional adoption. However, this achievement is not reflected in the ETH price, which created a significant disconnect between ecosystem fundamentals and market performance. For investors who bought ETH at the beginning of 2025, this year has been filled with hope that turned into disillusionment, with unrealized losses reaching 15% or more.
Changes in Ethereum Investment Standards
The biggest change in 2025 is not about price but how the market perceives Ethereum. In previous years, Ethereum investment remained exclusive to blockchain enthusiasts and traders. But this year has brought a paradigm shift in that regard.
The first signal came from the ETF market. From June 1 to September 30, inflows into Ethereum ETFs exceeded $10 billion—approximately five times higher than in the first half of the year. This ETF infrastructure has actually opened the door for retail investors who never considered Ethereum as an investment vehicle.
At the same time, corporate treasury strategies focused on ETH have become a hot topic. Unlike Bitcoin treasuries, which are simply asset holdings, ETH treasuries offer an additional generating mechanism: staking rewards. Discovering this edge has inspired well-known companies to allocate significant ETH positions on their balance sheets.
Currently, the five leading companies with the largest Ethereum holdings hold a combined 5.56 million ETH, representing over 4.6% of the total supply, with a current valuation exceeding $16 billion dollars. These figures demonstrate the substantial inflow of institutional capital into the Ethereum ecosystem this year.
The Standard of Success for Ethereum Infrastructure
If we measure Ethereum using traditional price appreciation standards, the results are disappointing. ETH reached an all-time high of $4,953 in August but did not stay there and fell back to lower levels in the following months. Currently, the price is $3,100, showing significant volatility and underperformance.
However, if we change the standard and look at blockchain infrastructure maturity, the picture is quite different. The two major technical upgrades—Pectra and Fusaka—addressed critical network challenges that the ecosystem had long awaited.
The Pectra upgrade, launched in May, expanded data sharding capabilities and provided larger compressed data storage for Layer 2 networks. The result was a significant reduction in transaction costs and faster confirmation times. The Fusaka upgrade further optimized scalability and user experience.
These technical improvements directly support Ethereum’s primary use cases: settlement layer for stablecoin transactions and platform for tokenized real-world assets (RWA). As of writing, Ethereum-based tokenized assets still account for more than half of the global tokenized asset value.
The Hidden True Value
The disconnect between Ethereum network success and ETH price performance reflects a fundamental truth about crypto markets: market attention and token appreciation do not always move in tandem.
Ethereum’s stablecoin ecosystem continues to grow and has become the backbone of on-chain financial activities. Tokenization of real-world assets on Ethereum—from corporate bonds to real estate—provides tangible use cases beyond speculation.
The institutional adoption pathway—through ETFs and corporate treasury structures—has transformed Ethereum from a niche blockchain asset into a mainstream portfolio allocation. On-chain governance, compliance frameworks, and regular financial disclosures have become possible because of Ethereum’s reliability and transparency.
These developments suggest that the long-term success standard for Ethereum should be oriented toward ecosystem utility and institutional integration, not just short-term price movements.
Looking to 2026
For those following the Ethereum roadmap, 2025 is seen as a transition year—from a pure speculation asset to the infrastructure backbone of the emerging on-chain financial system.
The challenge now is how to bridge this disconnect. The Ethereum ecosystem has proven to be technically sound and institutionally viable. The question is when market attention will convert ecosystem momentum into sustained token price appreciation.
In the short term, price volatility is likely to continue due to broader market cycles and macro factors. But fundamentally, Ethereum’s achievements in 2025—from technical upgrades to institutional framework development—have laid a solid foundation for sustainable long-term growth.
The lesson for 2025 is clear: Ethereum network success and ETH token price are operating under different standards this year. The first is reaching institutional acceptance and infrastructure maturity. The second remains at the mercy of broader market sentiment. The convergence of the two is not guaranteed, but the groundwork for it has already been laid.