When you look at the numbers, something doesn’t add up. XRP sits at a market cap of $124.80 billion with only modest on-chain activity, while Solana—with significantly lower valuation—demonstrates millions of active addresses powering real DeFi applications. This paradox has sparked fresh debate among industry observers, including prominent figures like Mike Novogratz, about what actually drives altcoin valuations in a maturing market.
Data Tell a Different Story
Recent blockchain metrics reveal a striking disconnect between market perception and network utilization. XRP maintains roughly 7.5 million addresses but shows limited transaction intensity. Cardano (ADA), trading at $0.39 with a $14.17 billion market cap, operates with approximately 10 million addresses—yet network activity remains surprisingly low compared to alternatives.
Compare this to Solana, where DeFi protocols and popular projects have attracted substantially more organic usage. The ecosystem demonstrates how actual utility—rather than historical reputation or community loyalty—increasingly determines competitive positioning.
From Faith to Fundamentals
During recent market analysis, Novogratz underscored a crucial shift: altcoins are transitioning from “faith-based assets” to entities evaluated like traditional companies. Revenue generation, active user bases, and tangible economic contributions now matter more than narrative momentum alone.
XRP’s case illustrates the challenge. Despite RippleNet’s partnerships with financial institutions for cross-border payments, blockchain activity has underperformed expectations. Similarly, Cardano—backed by strong community engagement and Charles Hoskinson’s leadership—has struggled to convert enthusiasm into meaningful network usage.
Novogratz pointed out that as competition intensifies, blockchains with low usage density face mounting pressure from faster-growing alternatives.
The Real-World Revenue Model
One project capturing attention is Hyperliquid (HYPE), currently trading at $23.51. The decentralized futures exchange generates genuine revenue and channels earnings into token buybacks, essentially creating a share-like economic structure for HYPE holders.
This approach represents what Novogratz believes will gain traction: assets backed by actual business mechanics and cash flow, rather than speculative positioning alone.
Market Takeaway
The lesson for investors is clear: in 2026’s crypto landscape, Mike and other market observers emphasize that Solana’s network-wide adoption and DeFi composability demonstrate value differently than XRP or ADA’s current trajectories. The market increasingly separates projects with real utility from those banking on community sentiment alone.
The question no longer centers on whether communities remain loyal—it’s whether those communities are actually using the networks they champion.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Valuation Gap: Why Altcoin Performance Doesn't Match Their Market Cap
When you look at the numbers, something doesn’t add up. XRP sits at a market cap of $124.80 billion with only modest on-chain activity, while Solana—with significantly lower valuation—demonstrates millions of active addresses powering real DeFi applications. This paradox has sparked fresh debate among industry observers, including prominent figures like Mike Novogratz, about what actually drives altcoin valuations in a maturing market.
Data Tell a Different Story
Recent blockchain metrics reveal a striking disconnect between market perception and network utilization. XRP maintains roughly 7.5 million addresses but shows limited transaction intensity. Cardano (ADA), trading at $0.39 with a $14.17 billion market cap, operates with approximately 10 million addresses—yet network activity remains surprisingly low compared to alternatives.
Compare this to Solana, where DeFi protocols and popular projects have attracted substantially more organic usage. The ecosystem demonstrates how actual utility—rather than historical reputation or community loyalty—increasingly determines competitive positioning.
From Faith to Fundamentals
During recent market analysis, Novogratz underscored a crucial shift: altcoins are transitioning from “faith-based assets” to entities evaluated like traditional companies. Revenue generation, active user bases, and tangible economic contributions now matter more than narrative momentum alone.
XRP’s case illustrates the challenge. Despite RippleNet’s partnerships with financial institutions for cross-border payments, blockchain activity has underperformed expectations. Similarly, Cardano—backed by strong community engagement and Charles Hoskinson’s leadership—has struggled to convert enthusiasm into meaningful network usage.
Novogratz pointed out that as competition intensifies, blockchains with low usage density face mounting pressure from faster-growing alternatives.
The Real-World Revenue Model
One project capturing attention is Hyperliquid (HYPE), currently trading at $23.51. The decentralized futures exchange generates genuine revenue and channels earnings into token buybacks, essentially creating a share-like economic structure for HYPE holders.
This approach represents what Novogratz believes will gain traction: assets backed by actual business mechanics and cash flow, rather than speculative positioning alone.
Market Takeaway
The lesson for investors is clear: in 2026’s crypto landscape, Mike and other market observers emphasize that Solana’s network-wide adoption and DeFi composability demonstrate value differently than XRP or ADA’s current trajectories. The market increasingly separates projects with real utility from those banking on community sentiment alone.
The question no longer centers on whether communities remain loyal—it’s whether those communities are actually using the networks they champion.