2026-01-12 14:37:16

There have been quite a few new developments in the RWA track recently. The recent upgrade of RWAX has elevated WorldAssets to a new level, directly aligning with the benchmark of RWA 3.0.

Currently, RWA projects on the market are either reduced to concept hype with superficial value or, like some leading projects, tightly controlled by institutions, leaving retail investors with no chance. RWAX's approach is indeed different—assets providers can submit materials directly to be on-chain, with AI automating the asset quality review in the backend. This mode maximizes efficiency and maintains credibility.

The idea of "market first, then pricing" is interesting. Compared to traditional RWA projects that set complex valuation logic from the start, this approach of letting the market participate in discovering value lowers the entry barrier and gives ordinary investors more say.

RWA5,61%

APP-4,6%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainSpy

· 17h ago

Alright, alright, it's the same old story of having a market first and then pricing it. Sounds great in theory, but how does it actually work in practice? --- AI automatic review sounds appealing, but I'm worried it might just become another black box. --- Retail investors' say? Haha, I want to see how long they can stick to this this time. --- Maximized efficiency and credibility? I've heard that line too many times. --- WorldAssets has been upgraded to a new level, but what about the previous heights? --- Submitting materials directly on the chain—why hasn't anyone done this simple thing before? --- Compared to those institutional platforms, RWAX's approach is definitely a bit different. --- Lower the barriers, and the efficiency of cutting in also increases. --- Discover value first, then price it. Basically, it's still a gamble on whether someone will buy in later. --- I just want to know how long this fresh scam can last this time.

View OriginalReply0

OvertimeSquid

· 21h ago

This RWAX AI review sounds pretty good, but how many projects can truly implement it... Retail investors having a say sounds a bit too idealistic. First have the market, then set the price—that logic I like. Sounds nice, but it all depends on how they operate later. Finally, there are projects willing to go against institutions.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 01-12 15:06

First, the market-driven pricing move is ruthless; finally, a project has thought about retail investors' feelings --- Is AI automatic review reliable, or is it just another set of marketing words --- Benchmarking RWA 3.0? Now everyone dares to ride the coattails, let's wait half a year and see --- Maximized efficiency is true, but I'm just worried it’s another institution in disguise to cut leeks --- This model is indeed much better than those pure concepts, but can it scale up --- It sounds nice, assets are on-chain, but still need intermediaries, can it really be direct? --- Retail investors feel good hearing their voice, but in the end, the price movements are still controlled by big players --- Just submit the materials and go on-chain, I really want to see how AI judges this review --- At least lowering the threshold is genuine, unlike some projects that require a million-dollar initial investment

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuyer

· 01-12 14:51

Well, let's not talk about anything else first. I have some doubts about this AI review part. Can retail investors really turn things around? Feels like just another scam. Low threshold sounds good, but it still depends on whether they'll get dumped again. But honestly, this approach is definitely more reasonable than those bragging projects.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 01-12 14:50

Well... AI automatic review, I still have some reservations about this. How can we ensure it doesn't go wrong? The RWAX model is indeed innovative, but the key depends on how it performs later. Is it better to have a market first and then set the price? Sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another feast for the early investors. Retail investors having a say is a good thing, as long as this thing is truly reliable. If this upgrade can really break the institutional monopoly, I need to pay attention. Wait, what exactly did WorldAssets change? Can you tell me the details? Who is the benchmark for RWA 3.0? Does it mean it can't catch up or has already surpassed the benchmark? It feels like hype, but where are the real application scenarios? I like this idea, but it's still too early to get off the train. How does the asset side go directly on-chain, and how is compliance ensured in terms of regulation? Market pricing sounds democratic, but can it really resist large investors dumping the market? If this model really works, the entire RWA track will definitely need a reshuffle.

View OriginalReply0

BoredWatcher

· 01-12 14:44

It's another RWA and 3.0, sounds pretty impressive, but this automated review system is indeed more reliable than those theoretical projects. I like the move of letting the market set the price, but I'm worried it might just be the same old wine in a new bottle. Wait, AI reviewing asset quality? What if problems arise and retail investors end up bearing the losses? It's interesting, but I still need to see how long it can last. Many RWA projects start off well but end up awkwardly. This time, at least, there's a somewhat different approach, not just the usual clichés. Institutional projects and hype concepts are getting boring; we need something fresh. If democratic pricing really works, that would be great—just depends on whether RWAX can withstand the pressure.

View OriginalReply0