Whenever Brevis's zero-knowledge proof technology is mentioned, it’s often met with a barrage of ZK jargon that can be intimidating. To be honest, once you peel back those complex terms, this set of tools essentially does the job of a "notary office."
Looking at several projects within the BSC ecosystem makes this clear. The hook functions Brevis provides to Pancake? Essentially, they prove that a user is indeed a large DEX trader with sufficient trading volume and history. The gas-free payment scheme designed for PieUSD? In simple terms, it uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify that the AI payment process is free of anomalies, ensuring each fund flow is compliant.
There are many other similar scenarios. The core advantage of this technical framework is that it can help various DeFi protocols perform identity verification, transaction validation, and compliance checks without exposing users' specific data. User privacy is protected, and project teams gain the necessary trust mechanisms.
Rather than being intimidated by ZK academic terminology, it’s better to understand it from a practical perspective — it’s essentially a "third-party certification tool" in the blockchain world, acting as a "witness" between trading parties. Once you grasp this logic, understanding the technical details becomes much easier.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetFreeloader
· 9h ago
Notary Office? Haha, that's a brilliant analogy. I was confused earlier by that bunch of ZK stuff.
You should have said it like that earlier; now I understand.
Wait, does the pancake set really recognize big players? Why didn't I use it?
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 9h ago
The analogy of the notary office is perfect; I understood it instantly.
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 9h ago
This notary office is a perfect analogy; finally, someone has explained zk clearly.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhale
· 9h ago
The analogy of the notary office is brilliant; I understood it immediately.
Whenever Brevis's zero-knowledge proof technology is mentioned, it’s often met with a barrage of ZK jargon that can be intimidating. To be honest, once you peel back those complex terms, this set of tools essentially does the job of a "notary office."
Looking at several projects within the BSC ecosystem makes this clear. The hook functions Brevis provides to Pancake? Essentially, they prove that a user is indeed a large DEX trader with sufficient trading volume and history. The gas-free payment scheme designed for PieUSD? In simple terms, it uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify that the AI payment process is free of anomalies, ensuring each fund flow is compliant.
There are many other similar scenarios. The core advantage of this technical framework is that it can help various DeFi protocols perform identity verification, transaction validation, and compliance checks without exposing users' specific data. User privacy is protected, and project teams gain the necessary trust mechanisms.
Rather than being intimidated by ZK academic terminology, it’s better to understand it from a practical perspective — it’s essentially a "third-party certification tool" in the blockchain world, acting as a "witness" between trading parties. Once you grasp this logic, understanding the technical details becomes much easier.