Got some $EUL tokens on Arbitrum, but here's the thing – soon as I try to bridge them out or swap them, the slippage hits different. We're talking 50%+ losses just to move the liquidity around.
This seems wild. Anyone else running into this? What's causing such brutal slippage on an Arbitrum token? Is it a liquidity issue on the bridge side, or are there some mechanics I'm missing with how $EUL behaves across chains?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProofOfNothing
· 15h ago
50% slippage? That requires such scarce liquidity. It feels like EUL has never truly come to life on Arbitrum.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQ
· 19h ago
ngl the 50% slippage thing is actually pretty fascinating from a liquidity design perspective... like you're essentially witnessing the token's cross-chain tokenomics in real time, yeah? it's not just a bridge problem—it's the whole aesthetic value proposition collapsing when you try to actualize it lol
Reply0
AlphaBrain
· 01-12 19:37
50% slippage? Bro, you're really cutting into your own flesh here. The liquidity of EUL is just too thin.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38
· 01-12 15:03
50% slippage? The liquidity of this thing is way too thin, it feels like a warning sign of a Ponzi scheme.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 01-12 15:03
50% slippage, this is definitely a liquidity trap.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-12 15:01
50% slippage? This isn't a liquidity issue; it's arbitrage bots lurking in the mempool with sandwich attacks + flash loans. Old tricks.
Got some $EUL tokens on Arbitrum, but here's the thing – soon as I try to bridge them out or swap them, the slippage hits different. We're talking 50%+ losses just to move the liquidity around.
This seems wild. Anyone else running into this? What's causing such brutal slippage on an Arbitrum token? Is it a liquidity issue on the bridge side, or are there some mechanics I'm missing with how $EUL behaves across chains?