2026-01-12 14:29:31

Speaking of the market performance of Meme coins, in terms of popularity, community consensus, and topic heat, combined with their ability to break through circles, several leading projects indeed stand out.

The status of a certain coin is similar to the recognition of a top Meme coin overseas — in terms of domestic discussion heat and aesthetic approval, its performance is indeed impressive. Many other Meme projects are somewhat lacking in aesthetic appeal, to be honest.

Of course, everyone is promoting their own held projects, which is normal. However, from a relatively objective perspective, some projects' visual presentation and cultural core are indeed more eye-catching. The community's aesthetic taste also somewhat determines the project's long-term vitality.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fren.eth

· 14h ago

Basically, it still depends on community aesthetics. Some meme coins are indeed naturally attractive, while others are doomed from the start. Wait, isn't this about certain coins? Alright, I admit I’m also hyping them up. Aesthetics can really determine life and death; sometimes it's even more important than fundamentals. Those that survive long-term are the ones that look comfortable at first glance; others should have already faded away. I don't know if our taste has changed or if new coins are really getting worse and worse.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-12 14:52

Breaking through the圈 is well said, but aesthetics are really a matter of personal taste. I think the cultural core of many coins is the real essence. Top projects do have some skills, but whether they have long-term vitality depends on whether the community can hold it down. Anyone can create hype, but the key is to have real things backing it up; otherwise, it's just a paper tiger. Honestly, some projects' visual packaging is overdone, which makes them seem very cheap. I agree with the view that aesthetic taste determines vitality, but the premise is that the community itself has good taste.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-12 14:51

The gap in the ability to break through circles is indeed evident; some meme coins just have poor aesthetic taste. The top few really know how to build community consensus, but others are far behind. To put it simply, it's about matching visual appeal with cultural core; otherwise, all efforts are in vain. Most holders want to create momentum, but only a few can truly win people's support; most are just for fun. Long-term vitality... it also depends on how long the community's taste can be maintained.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 01-12 14:48

Aesthetics really can be competitive; different projects just compete over cultural core and visual presentation. Some coins can indeed be judged at a glance as having poor style. Ultimately, the fate of Meme coins still depends on community taste, and that's correct. To put it simply, some projects have already broken out of the circle, while others are still just self-entertaining. Projects with strong cross-over ability truly stand out, and this is no coincidence. I never really thought carefully about the dimension of aesthetic taste before, no wonder some coins can become popular.

View OriginalReply0