Why do moats become narrower? Why do they widen again? Just look at Kodak and Coca-Cola to understand.
Thirty years ago, Kodak was almost invincible in the photography industry. When people thought of taking photos, they thought of Kodak — this is called mental share, which is a true moat. Then they made a fatal mistake: allowing Fuji into the market and even letting them participate in the Olympics. What was the result? Fuji quickly caught up, and Kodak’s moat instantly turned into paper-thin.
Coca-Cola is a completely different approach. Thirty years ago, their moat was already very deep, and now it’s getting wider and wider. What’s the secret? Every time infrastructure is built in a new country, Coca-Cola’s moat expands outward by a circle. This is not passive defense but proactive occupation.
The key difference is this: Kodak guarded the existing market and was eventually eroded; Coca-Cola continuously explores new territories, and their moat grows along with it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Why do moats become narrower? Why do they widen again? Just look at Kodak and Coca-Cola to understand.
Thirty years ago, Kodak was almost invincible in the photography industry. When people thought of taking photos, they thought of Kodak — this is called mental share, which is a true moat. Then they made a fatal mistake: allowing Fuji into the market and even letting them participate in the Olympics. What was the result? Fuji quickly caught up, and Kodak’s moat instantly turned into paper-thin.
Coca-Cola is a completely different approach. Thirty years ago, their moat was already very deep, and now it’s getting wider and wider. What’s the secret? Every time infrastructure is built in a new country, Coca-Cola’s moat expands outward by a circle. This is not passive defense but proactive occupation.
The key difference is this: Kodak guarded the existing market and was eventually eroded; Coca-Cola continuously explores new territories, and their moat grows along with it.