Regarding the issue of account ownership, a senior executive from a leading exchange recently provided an explanation. The core logic is simple: whoever registered with the identity information owns the account. This is not a new rule, but a fundamental compliance baseline.

The real-world scenario is as follows: someone purchases an already registered account, resulting in assets being frozen, which then leads to disputes. However, the platform’s stance is actually unshakeable—if the original registrant can provide complete and valid identification proof, claiming ownership of the account, the platform will definitely support them. Conversely, the buyer can only say "I paid for it," which is clearly untenable.

To put it more plainly, if someone loses their ID card, and another person uses that lost ID to open an account, how could the platform possibly give the account to the latter? This is a strict rule in any legitimate financial institution.

Another key point is that buying and selling accounts itself violates platform agreements. Whether it’s transferring, selling, or renting out accounts, it’s considered a violation. This is not only a compliance requirement but also a measure to protect each user’s asset security. Because once the account changes hands, the identity verification system becomes invalid, and risks are everywhere.