Zero Knowledge Proof distinguishes itself through an innovative network structure designed around four independent yet interconnected layers. Unlike traditional blockchains that bundle consensus, execution, and storage into a single system—creating bottlenecks and scalability issues—ZKP deliberately compartmentalizes these functions. This architectural approach enables the network to maintain privacy, verify AI computations, and process data while keeping sensitive information protected throughout.
The conventional blockchain design stacks all operations on top of each other. This creates congestion, limits throughput, and complicates scaling solutions. Zero Knowledge Proof takes a different approach by isolating four core functions into dedicated layers:
Consensus Layer – Validates network activity using hybrid Proof of Intelligence and Proof of Space mechanisms
Security Layer – Maintains privacy through advanced cryptographic protocols including zero-knowledge proofs
Storage Layer – Manages both on-chain and off-chain data through distributed systems
Execution Environment – Runs smart contracts and compute-intensive tasks using EVM and WASM
This modular network structure allows each component to operate independently while remaining synchronized through coordinated protocols. The separation prevents one layer’s upgrades from destabilizing the others.
Layer 1: Consensus Mechanism – Validation Through Intelligence and Space Proof
The consensus layer secures the network by confirming transactions through a weighted formula combining Proof of Intelligence (PoI) and Proof of Space (PoSp). Using Substrate’s BABE and GRANDPA protocols:
BABE manages block production, selecting validators through random VRF (Verifiable Random Function) selection
GRANDPA finalizes blocks with near-instant certainty, typically within 1–2 seconds
Block intervals operate at a default six-second cadence, adjustable between three and twelve seconds depending on network conditions. The system organizes validators into epochs lasting approximately 2,400 blocks (roughly four hours). Rewards distribute based on performance across all three scoring dimensions.
Layer 2: Privacy and Verification – Cryptographic Proofs Without Exposure
The security layer implements zero-knowledge proof technology to verify computations and transactions without revealing underlying data. Two primary proof systems operate in parallel:
zk-SNARKs – Compact proofs (288 bytes) with rapid verification (~2 ms), requiring a trusted setup phase
zk-STARKs – Larger proofs (~100 KB) with slower verification (~40 ms), but eliminating the trusted setup requirement
Multi-Party Computation enables distributed computation across untrusted parties
Homomorphic Encryption allows operations on encrypted data without decryption
ECDSA and EdDSA signatures provide authentication across different scenarios
The proof generation workflow follows four sequential steps: Circuit Definition → Witness Generation → Proof Creation → Verification. Parallel proof generation enables the network to handle AI task verification in real-time without creating verification bottlenecks.
Layer 3: Data Management – On-Chain Efficiency and Off-Chain Persistence
The storage layer implements a hybrid approach for different data characteristics:
On-chain storage utilizes Patricia Tries, enabling rapid access patterns at approximately 1 millisecond per operation. This structure optimizes for frequent reads and writes while maintaining cryptographic integrity.
Off-chain storage leverages IPFS for distributed content addressing and Filecoin for long-term persistence incentivized through token rewards. Merkle Trees verify data integrity across distributed nodes.
Off-chain data retrieval achieves approximately 100 MB per second throughput across 1,000 participating nodes. The Proof of Space scoring mechanism evaluates storage contributions:
Participants with higher capacity and reliability receive proportionally higher rewards from network inflation.
Layer 4: Computation Environment – Smart Contracts and AI Task Execution
The execution environment operates through dual virtual machines serving different computational profiles:
EVM provides compatibility with Ethereum-based applications and enables seamless migration of existing smart contracts
WASM handles computationally intensive operations including AI model inference and heavy algorithmic tasks
ZK Wrappers establish the critical connection between this layer and the Security Layer, ensuring all executed computations generate corresponding zero-knowledge proofs for verification without data exposure.
State management leverages Patricia Tries with 1 millisecond read/write latency. The network currently processes 100–300 transactions per second under normal conditions, with theoretical scaling to 2,000 TPS under optimized configurations.
Network Synchronization and Cross-Layer Communication
Transactions traverse the network structure in sequential flow:
Consensus → Security → Execution → Storage
This pipeline maintains synchronization within a 2–6 second window, ensuring consistency across distributed validators. Each layer operates with sufficient independence that improvements or maintenance in one component does not cascade to others. This compartmentalization enables continuous protocol upgrades without network disruption.
Energy Efficiency and Performance Metrics
Zero Knowledge Proof consumes approximately 90% less energy than Proof of Work systems, primarily due to reliance on low-power storage devices rather than specialized mining hardware:
Block finality: 1–2 seconds
Standard block interval: 3–12 seconds (adjustable)
Base throughput: 100–300 TPS
Maximum scaled throughput: 2,000 TPS
zk-SNARK verification latency: ~2 milliseconds
Energy consumption: ~10× lower than PoW chains
Proof Pods: Hardware Nodes in the Network Structure
Proof Pods function as hardware nodes that directly integrate with all four layers of the network structure. Each Pod simultaneously:
Participates in consensus validation
Generates zero-knowledge proofs
Stores and retrieves data
Executes AI computation tasks
Economic rewards scale with node capability levels:
Level 1 Pod: Approximately $1 per day in rewards
Level 300 Pod: Up to $300 per day in rewards
This design directly ties token value to actual computational resources deployed rather than pure speculation.
Contrasting Development Approaches
Typical blockchain projects follow this sequence:
Token fundraising
Infrastructure development
Value derived from speculation and adoption potential
Zero Knowledge Proof reversed this sequence:
Hardware infrastructure development ($17M in deployed Pods)
Network launch with operational systems
Value tied to measurable compute capacity and utility
The network already processes transactions and maintains data across distributed nodes, representing functional infrastructure rather than promises of future development.
Practical Applications Beyond Theory
The four-layer architecture enables several concrete use cases:
AI Model Privacy – Train machine learning models on sensitive datasets without exposing raw data
Confidential Data Marketplaces – Buyers and sellers transact without revealing transaction details or dataset contents
Healthcare Records – Patients authorize specific data access while maintaining comprehensive privacy
Financial Transaction Privacy – Settlements occur with full verification but without exposing transaction amounts or parties
The Architectural Advantage
Zero Knowledge Proof’s network structure deliberately separates consensus, security, storage, and execution functions into modular layers that operate with high independence while maintaining coordination. This design enables privacy preservation, efficient scaling, and AI computation verification. The infrastructure exists today as operational hardware rather than theoretical potential, anchoring network value to tangible resources and computational capacity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Separating Blockchain Functions: How Zero Knowledge Proof's Network Structure Achieves Privacy and Efficiency
Zero Knowledge Proof distinguishes itself through an innovative network structure designed around four independent yet interconnected layers. Unlike traditional blockchains that bundle consensus, execution, and storage into a single system—creating bottlenecks and scalability issues—ZKP deliberately compartmentalizes these functions. This architectural approach enables the network to maintain privacy, verify AI computations, and process data while keeping sensitive information protected throughout.
Rethinking Blockchain Architecture: Why Layer Separation Matters
The conventional blockchain design stacks all operations on top of each other. This creates congestion, limits throughput, and complicates scaling solutions. Zero Knowledge Proof takes a different approach by isolating four core functions into dedicated layers:
This modular network structure allows each component to operate independently while remaining synchronized through coordinated protocols. The separation prevents one layer’s upgrades from destabilizing the others.
Layer 1: Consensus Mechanism – Validation Through Intelligence and Space Proof
The consensus layer secures the network by confirming transactions through a weighted formula combining Proof of Intelligence (PoI) and Proof of Space (PoSp). Using Substrate’s BABE and GRANDPA protocols:
The validator scoring system calculates:
Validator Weight = (α × PoI Score) + (β × PoSp Score) + (γ × Stake)
Block intervals operate at a default six-second cadence, adjustable between three and twelve seconds depending on network conditions. The system organizes validators into epochs lasting approximately 2,400 blocks (roughly four hours). Rewards distribute based on performance across all three scoring dimensions.
Layer 2: Privacy and Verification – Cryptographic Proofs Without Exposure
The security layer implements zero-knowledge proof technology to verify computations and transactions without revealing underlying data. Two primary proof systems operate in parallel:
Additional cryptographic tools reinforce security:
The proof generation workflow follows four sequential steps: Circuit Definition → Witness Generation → Proof Creation → Verification. Parallel proof generation enables the network to handle AI task verification in real-time without creating verification bottlenecks.
Layer 3: Data Management – On-Chain Efficiency and Off-Chain Persistence
The storage layer implements a hybrid approach for different data characteristics:
On-chain storage utilizes Patricia Tries, enabling rapid access patterns at approximately 1 millisecond per operation. This structure optimizes for frequent reads and writes while maintaining cryptographic integrity.
Off-chain storage leverages IPFS for distributed content addressing and Filecoin for long-term persistence incentivized through token rewards. Merkle Trees verify data integrity across distributed nodes.
Off-chain data retrieval achieves approximately 100 MB per second throughput across 1,000 participating nodes. The Proof of Space scoring mechanism evaluates storage contributions:
PoSp Score = (Storage Capacity × Uptime Percentage) / Total Network Storage
Participants with higher capacity and reliability receive proportionally higher rewards from network inflation.
Layer 4: Computation Environment – Smart Contracts and AI Task Execution
The execution environment operates through dual virtual machines serving different computational profiles:
ZK Wrappers establish the critical connection between this layer and the Security Layer, ensuring all executed computations generate corresponding zero-knowledge proofs for verification without data exposure.
State management leverages Patricia Tries with 1 millisecond read/write latency. The network currently processes 100–300 transactions per second under normal conditions, with theoretical scaling to 2,000 TPS under optimized configurations.
Network Synchronization and Cross-Layer Communication
Transactions traverse the network structure in sequential flow:
Consensus → Security → Execution → Storage
This pipeline maintains synchronization within a 2–6 second window, ensuring consistency across distributed validators. Each layer operates with sufficient independence that improvements or maintenance in one component does not cascade to others. This compartmentalization enables continuous protocol upgrades without network disruption.
Energy Efficiency and Performance Metrics
Zero Knowledge Proof consumes approximately 90% less energy than Proof of Work systems, primarily due to reliance on low-power storage devices rather than specialized mining hardware:
Proof Pods: Hardware Nodes in the Network Structure
Proof Pods function as hardware nodes that directly integrate with all four layers of the network structure. Each Pod simultaneously:
Economic rewards scale with node capability levels:
This design directly ties token value to actual computational resources deployed rather than pure speculation.
Contrasting Development Approaches
Typical blockchain projects follow this sequence:
Zero Knowledge Proof reversed this sequence:
The network already processes transactions and maintains data across distributed nodes, representing functional infrastructure rather than promises of future development.
Practical Applications Beyond Theory
The four-layer architecture enables several concrete use cases:
The Architectural Advantage
Zero Knowledge Proof’s network structure deliberately separates consensus, security, storage, and execution functions into modular layers that operate with high independence while maintaining coordination. This design enables privacy preservation, efficient scaling, and AI computation verification. The infrastructure exists today as operational hardware rather than theoretical potential, anchoring network value to tangible resources and computational capacity.