2026-01-12 13:36:27

ADI Chain's ambition is not to satisfy today's crypto users, but to build infrastructure for ordinary people of tomorrow.

Imagine — money, identity, records, payments — the systems we use every day, all migrated onto the chain, without complex processes or worries about risks. It sounds a bit sci-fi, but that's exactly what ADI Chain is doing.

The key difference lies in its original design intent: working closely with governments and institutions, starting from compliance and practical needs, to create blockchain infrastructure that can be widely accepted. This is not a niche geek project, but a technical solution aimed at future institutional frameworks. Practical applications such as financial inclusion, identity verification, and cross-border payments are all within the scope.

This approach represents a certain direction for the next generation of blockchain development — not opposing traditional systems, but achieving true integration based on transparency, efficiency, and security.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletDoomsDay

· 5h ago

Overthinking it, the key is whether it can truly be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

NftRegretMachine

· 12h ago

The phrase "compliance infrastructure" has become tiresome; the key question is whether it can really be implemented. --- Rather than integration, it's more about compromise, but perhaps that's just the reality. --- It sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just hype and cashing in on the concept. --- There is indeed potential for collaboration with government agencies, but it depends on how it is actually implemented. --- Ordinary people don't care about on-chain systems; as long as it's cheaper, that's fine. --- This idea is good, but there's too much competition. Why choose ADI? --- The term "infrastructure" has been overused; let's wait until there's real implementation before bragging. --- It's somewhat interesting; at least it's not as crazy as those previous projects. --- Getting identity verification sorted out is true skill; right now, it's all talk and no action. --- Opposing traditional systems might actually make you more constrained by them.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 16h ago

Collaborating with the government... sounds great, but once implemented, can we avoid turning it into another regulated centralized entity?

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-14 13:38

Oops, another "game-changing" project, this time aiming to get cozy with the government?

View OriginalReply0

DataOnlooker

· 01-12 14:06

The compliance route, it sounds good in theory, but can it really be implemented?

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 01-12 14:06

To be honest, collaborating with the government is a bit uncertain; it depends on how we work together...

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Vaccinated

· 01-12 14:03

This rhetoric sounds good, but compliance has always been a double-edged sword in crypto. Does cooperating with the government truly help avoid risks? What has history proven?

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 01-12 14:02

Hmm... collaborating with the government sounds good, but can we really trust it?

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 01-12 13:48

To be honest, I think this way of thinking sounds a bit too idealistic. Rather than collaborating, it's more like being regulated. Can it really achieve seamless migration? Compliance is often just an excuse to cut back on innovation.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 01-12 13:38

Sounds good, but I've heard too many times about cooperating with the government, and in the end, it just gets heavily regulated.

View OriginalReply0