Jupiter's prediction market experiment is struggling to gain real momentum. After roughly 2.5 months in operation, the metrics tell a sobering story: total trading volume has only reached around $1.5M across approximately 40,000 trades. That breaks down to just $38 per trade on average and roughly $155 per user. Total fees collected sit at a mere $53k. While the integration technically exists on the platform, user adoption remains painfully thin. The gap between potential and actual traction is hard to ignore—this particular initiative illustrates how challenging it can be to bootstrap liquidity and engagement in predictive derivatives, even with established infrastructure already in place.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 19h ago
Wow, $38 per order? The health factor is almost off the charts. Prediction markets are risky; once liquidity can't keep up, it's a ticking time bomb, a domino effect sooner or later. Jupiter clearly didn't properly assess the risk control threshold in this wave...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTears
· 22h ago
Haha, the prediction market is another failed project, with an average of $38 per transaction. How quiet must it be?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 01-13 17:36
Ha, another prediction market has failed... Jupiter's performance this time is a bit disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalist
· 01-13 08:58
Hmm... $1.5M in two and a half months? Jupiter's prediction market is a bit disappointing, with an average of only $38 per trade. The liquidity just can't support it.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetire
· 01-12 14:00
Oh no, Jupiter's prediction market experiment is a bit disappointing... Only 1.5 million in trading volume after 2.5 months? An average of just $38 per trade, the liquidity is way too low, how can it be playable?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 01-12 13:49
Wow, $38 per transaction? How few people are trading then, predicting the market is so hard to do...
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 01-12 13:43
tbh the $38 avg trade size screams insufficient validation before launch... didn't they audit this thing three times over?
Reply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 01-12 13:31
Ha... $150 per user, is this what they call the mainstream narrative?
Jupiter's prediction market experiment is struggling to gain real momentum. After roughly 2.5 months in operation, the metrics tell a sobering story: total trading volume has only reached around $1.5M across approximately 40,000 trades. That breaks down to just $38 per trade on average and roughly $155 per user. Total fees collected sit at a mere $53k. While the integration technically exists on the platform, user adoption remains painfully thin. The gap between potential and actual traction is hard to ignore—this particular initiative illustrates how challenging it can be to bootstrap liquidity and engagement in predictive derivatives, even with established infrastructure already in place.