2026-01-12 13:25:07

A major exchange is about to launch the U stablecoin, but the true significance of this move goes far beyond the surface.

Rather than simply adding a new stablecoin, it should be seen as a strategic move on the exchange's part within the BNB Chain ecosystem—building liquidity and use cases is the core goal. The policy of zero fees for listing, U/USDT and U/USDC trading pairs, is straightforward: lay down the infrastructure first.

What's interesting is that U is not just serving for matching trades. It is building a broader ecosystem application space. From the exchange channels between stablecoins, to the cross-chain liquidity hub, and to the foundational assets of the DeFi ecosystem—U's ambitions go far beyond traditional trading pairs. This move marks a new stage where stablecoin competition has evolved from mere token supply to deep ecosystem integration.

BNB0,31%

USDC-0,03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Degen4Breakfast

· 5h ago

Damn, you're playing chess again. This time, it's definitely not just about adding a coin. I see through the zero-fee trick—it's all about locking liquidity within the ecosystem. Can U become a hub? Honestly, it depends on whether the subsequent ecosystem applications are strong enough. Deep ecosystem integration sounds impressive, but the real question is whether users will actually use it. Another new stablecoin? My wallet is already full. But this approach is indeed quite interesting—much smarter than just issuing a coin.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainGriller

· 01-13 18:28

You're trying to cut in line again, I know this trick too well... Zero fees, zero transaction costs, basically just trying to build up liquidity. The ecosystem integration part is indeed interesting, but the question is, can U beat USDT? This move is really about paving the way for the BNB ecosystem, not an innovation in stablecoins. Wait, isn't this just a disguised subsidy to users... It sounds strategic, but in reality, it's just throwing money to attract users. I've seen this tactic too many times. DeFi core assets? First, prove it won't become the next bad debt...

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropBro

· 01-12 13:55

Damn, it's the same old trick again, zero fees to lure people in, then slowly harvest later. Ecological integration is the real way; stablecoins are already outdated. This time it's really different, U's ambitions are a bit big, huh? You're trying to cut my leeks again, I don't believe you. Wait, is this paving the way for BNB Chain? I don't see it. Zero fees sound great, but the question is, who is paying? Liquidity stacking? Basically, it's just throwing money to generate data. This is the proper ecological layout; other stablecoins should really learn from this.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-12 13:54

Zero fee tricks are back again, it's nothing more than pouring money to expand territory. Ecosystem integration sounds impressive, but frankly, it's still a liquidity争夺战. The BNB ecosystem is becoming more and more complex, even stablecoins can be played with. It's both an ecosystem and a foundational asset, how many times do I have to say this?

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekConfession

· 01-12 13:49

Are you playing chess again? I've seen this zero-fee trick many times, and in the end, it's just another way to cut the leeks. Ecological integration sounds fancy, but basically it's just trying to lock your coins. Stablecoins competing in the ecosystem? Feels more like a dojo inside a snail shell, with little real innovation. The name U... whether it’s random or not, but the liquidity stacking is indeed a skill. I’m optimistic. Wait, is this hype for BNB? Or can it really break the current stablecoin landscape? Feeling a bit confused. The cross-chain hub is pretty good, just worried about execution delays. Another ecological dreamer, waiting to see how it ultimately fails. The real test is ahead—how long can zero fees last?

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_not_broke

· 01-12 13:40

Zero fee tricks, just thinking about it makes you realize how much traffic will be cut later... This time it's really different; ecosystem integration is the way to go. Those who only focus on coins should reflect. BNB Chain again, trying to grab USDT's territory? Not afraid of taking big risks. Using stablecoins to fight the ecosystem battle, in simple terms, is about building your own empire. Clever...

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-12 13:33

This is chess, zero fees are not the main point; the liquidity hub is the real killer move. They are playing quite aggressively in ecosystem integration; the stablecoin track is about to change. Wait, can they really support this ambition? Feels a bit overhyped. To put it simply, it's the exchanges vying for dominance in the BNB ecosystem—smart move. But if this continues, could it trigger a stablecoin war? I'm a bit worried about liquidity fragmentation.

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 01-12 13:30

zero fees screams liquidity trap to me... they're basically paying you to hold bags while they build their infrastructure moat. seen this playbook before—network effects first, extraction later. fair enough though, if the consensus holds

Reply0