Federal Reserve Chair Powell's recent conflict with the U.S. Department of Justice has escalated to a new level. The DOJ launched a criminal investigation against him over testimony related to a building renovation project, to which Powell responded publicly: this is not a genuine investigation, but outright political suppression.
The core trigger of the entire incident occurred last June. During a Senate testimony, Powell mentioned a construction project, and the DOJ subsequently issued a grand jury subpoena using this as an excuse. However, Powell firmly rejected this, claiming that the investigation had no relation to his testimony and was merely a pretext for political pressure.
Why is this matter so critical to the crypto circle? Powell's counterattack touches on a fundamental issue: Can the Federal Reserve still independently set interest rates, or must it yield to political pressure? This question goes far beyond any individual—it directly determines the decision-making space of the Fed.
From the perspective of the cryptocurrency market, Fed policies are considered a stabilizing force. The direction of interest rates influences liquidity across the entire financial system, which in turn affects the valuation logic of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Once political forces begin to interfere with the Fed's independence, interest rate decisions could become uncertain, which would be akin to an earthquake for the crypto market that relies heavily on liquidity conditions.
In the short term, Powell's tough stance may help stabilize market psychology expectations. But long-term concerns have already emerged: when government power extends into the core of financial decision-making, the market's confidence foundation itself begins to weaken. No matter how the Fed acts in the future, the entire crypto market is likely to be affected by this political risk.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
IfIWereOnChain
· 4h ago
This is really mind-blowing. Political players are using building certificates as an excuse—can it get any more absurd... The Fed's independence is about to be gone, and the crypto world is directly screwed.
Powell's tough stance is a good thing, but the signals behind it... Damn, if liquidity gets messed up, what do we have left to drive the rally?
Basically, it's about power trying to reach into the central bank—that's the real horror story.
This logic is just too far-fetched. Can they just find any reason to sue? It feels like the entire system is loosening.
Political risk is indeed easy to overlook, but the threat to holdings is actually greater than hackers.
If the Fed really gets intervened with, can Bitcoin stay stable? Feeling a bit anxious.
Political struggles are hitting the Fed, and retail investors like us are just waiting to be harvested.
Powell's tough counterattack might save the day in the short term, but it can't cure the root problem.
The core question here is: who is the real decision-maker? When the answer is vague, the crypto world has no anchor.
Building renovation?? The excuse you came up with is way too perfunctory.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 6h ago
Here we go again, this is why I don't trust any centralized shit... The Federal Reserve is doomed.
Political theater always ends up with us footing the bill, BTC is basically the answer.
Now the Federal Reserve also knows what helplessness feels like haha, anyway I've already fully committed to DeFi.
When interest rates go haywire, cryptos have to go crazy too. I trust ETH more than these old guys.
See, in the end, it still comes down to on-chain independence. Traditional finance playing this way will eventually fail.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayer
· 01-12 13:53
This political farce is getting more and more ridiculous. If the Federal Reserve really gets hijacked, the interest rate policy will be doomed.
Construction renovation project?? That excuse is too stiff haha.
Once liquidity gets out of control, our coins will definitely tremble along with it, and that's the real problem.
It's okay to stabilize in the short term, but I'm worried that if the long-term confidence foundation truly collapses, that will be really painful.
However, Powell's attitude is still firm; at least he hasn't compromised directly. This is worth watching to see how things develop next.
The biggest fear in the crypto world is policy being artificially distorted. We really need to stay alert and observe the situation.
It feels like this won't end so quickly; we all have to wait and see how the Department of Justice moves next.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 01-12 13:53
Damn, what a ridiculous situation. Even building renovations can turn into criminal cases? Clearly, it's political struggle.
Powell needs to stand firm this time. If he softens, the crypto world will be doomed.
If the Federal Reserve really gets played out, Bitcoin could either skyrocket or plummet—no one can predict...
The influence of political interference is becoming more and more intense. It feels like chaos is about to start.
Anyway, I should hide my wallet first and see how things develop after the storm passes.
If liquidity gets messed up, this winter might be a bit cold.
Honestly, I'm a little scared. What if the Federal Reserve can't do its job properly?
Politicians really shouldn't meddle in finance recklessly. The retail investors will suffer in the end.
Powell standing his ground is definitely satisfying, but the hidden risks behind this...
Looking at this situation gives me a headache. The crypto market is about to face new uncertainties again.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisery
· 01-12 13:46
Really? Building renovations can lead to criminal investigations? This tactic is way too obvious.
---
Here we go again with political struggles, the crypto world suffers.
---
Wait, does this mean the Federal Reserve might not be as independent as we thought? What about my BTC?
---
Powell directly confronts the Department of Justice, I just want to see who wins, haha.
---
Political interference in the independence of the central bank... liquidity is gone, the crypto world is really dead.
---
Basically, it's a power struggle, and retail investors are the ones who end up paying the price.
---
No, the building project testimony leading to a criminal investigation? What's going on?
---
If the Federal Reserve falls, the valuation logic of Bitcoin will have to be completely recalculated. Just thinking about it gives me a headache.
---
If the Fed loses this round, the entire financial system's confidence will be gone.
---
Honestly, just one question: Can the Federal Reserve still remain neutral? Or not?
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 01-12 13:43
Damn, it’s really getting serious now. If the Federal Reserve’s independence can’t be maintained... the crypto world will be half cooled down.
Powell’s tough stance against the Department of Justice is basically giving all market participants a psychological vaccine, but it feels a bit too late.
Political interference in financial decisions will eventually lead to consequences, and Bitcoin will be the scapegoat.
Can building renovations be dragged into criminal investigations?? This is too surreal.
If the Federal Reserve is truly sidelined, and liquidity conditions change, we’ll all have to eat dirt.
Honestly, the more hawkish Powell gets, the more uneasy I feel... because it shows how serious the problem is.
It seems like the rules of interest rate games are being rewritten, and that’s the most terrifying part.
Short-term stability? Long-term, it’s just a ticking time bomb. Whoever gets caught will be unlucky.
Political influence is becoming more and more intense, and the market confidence foundation is really shaky.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 01-12 13:31
Politically inept now, the Federal Reserve's independence is just a joke, and the crypto world is directly being roasted on the fire.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 01-12 13:29
Political players are starting to mess with the Federal Reserve again, which could introduce volatility. Can BTC still stay stable?
Federal Reserve Chair Powell's recent conflict with the U.S. Department of Justice has escalated to a new level. The DOJ launched a criminal investigation against him over testimony related to a building renovation project, to which Powell responded publicly: this is not a genuine investigation, but outright political suppression.
The core trigger of the entire incident occurred last June. During a Senate testimony, Powell mentioned a construction project, and the DOJ subsequently issued a grand jury subpoena using this as an excuse. However, Powell firmly rejected this, claiming that the investigation had no relation to his testimony and was merely a pretext for political pressure.
Why is this matter so critical to the crypto circle? Powell's counterattack touches on a fundamental issue: Can the Federal Reserve still independently set interest rates, or must it yield to political pressure? This question goes far beyond any individual—it directly determines the decision-making space of the Fed.
From the perspective of the cryptocurrency market, Fed policies are considered a stabilizing force. The direction of interest rates influences liquidity across the entire financial system, which in turn affects the valuation logic of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Once political forces begin to interfere with the Fed's independence, interest rate decisions could become uncertain, which would be akin to an earthquake for the crypto market that relies heavily on liquidity conditions.
In the short term, Powell's tough stance may help stabilize market psychology expectations. But long-term concerns have already emerged: when government power extends into the core of financial decision-making, the market's confidence foundation itself begins to weaken. No matter how the Fed acts in the future, the entire crypto market is likely to be affected by this political risk.