2026-01-12 13:22:55

Sharing a practical low-cost deployment strategy. When the market adjusts and crypto assets drop sharply, it's the perfect time to build positions gradually. The key is to avoid all-in bets on rebounds; instead, spread out your investments over multiple cycles to ensure each fund has enough impact.

How exactly to do it? Use small amounts of capital to enter the market in batches at low prices, controlling single-entry risk. This way, even if the rebound only yields 30%, you can gradually lower your average cost. Once the rebound doubles, you can quickly recover your principal, and subsequent gains will be true profit accumulation. At this point, you can be moderately aggressive and let profits run.

Major cycle turning points often brew in extreme pessimism. Instead of trying to pinpoint the exact bottom, it's better to use time to gain space. The logic of deploying in batches at low prices is just that. When the major cycle truly kicks off, you've already secured your position in advance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotSatoshi

· 01-12 13:52

Basically, don't go all in; you need to take it slow. Entering in batches is indeed a well-known strategy, but can anyone really do it? It seems simple, but executing it requires ironclad patience. Making a 30% rebound profit? Why do I always seem to buy at the top? Using time to buy space—I've heard this a hundred times. The key is having spare cash; without it, no matter how good the strategy is, it's useless. Low-price positioning sounds great, but I don't know when it's truly low.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-12 13:52

Staggered deployment of this logic isn't a problem, but I've seen too many people talk a good game and then completely fail during execution. The key isn't the strategy; it's whether you can truly resist going all-in. That's even more difficult than auditing code permissions.

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 01-12 13:52

Exactly right, staggered deployment is definitely more reliable than going all in. Wait, is it really that easy to copy at the bottom? Every time someone claims they've bottomed out, they end up getting crushed through. I've used the staggered approach before, especially when I didn't have much money, it's the cheapest way. Time for more space sounds good, but the key is to withstand the psychological fluctuations in the middle. After this round, I also adopted a staggered approach, always thinking it could go lower each time. What happened to the guys who went all in now?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 01-12 13:51

That's so right, phased deployment is indeed the key to survival. Don't play that all-in gamble; you'll end up looking pretty bad. Buying in batches at low prices is actually giving yourself more chances. The all-in gambler can only watch the rebound and cry. Have you heard this saying? Instead of predicting the bottom, it's better to fill the bottom. That's what this guy means. A decline can actually be an opportunity; it all depends on who dares to press the buy button in the darkness before dawn.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 01-12 13:42

ngl this is just dca with extra steps... technically speaking if you look at the data most retail degens still fomo at the top anyway lol. the "time over timing" thing sounds nice but correlation coefficient between conviction and actual execution? yeah that's basically zero fr. idk feels like sustainable returns require discipline that doesn't really exist in this space tbh

Reply0

DustCollector

· 01-12 13:32

Gradual deployment is indeed stable, but honestly, who can really resist going all-in? --- It sounds easy, but in reality, nine out of ten times you’ll mess up. You can’t even buy at the bottom. --- I’ve tried this cost averaging approach, but it’s really mentally exhausting. --- Really, if you wait for the big cycle to start, you’ve already missed several waves. Might as well go all in directly. --- This logic isn’t wrong, but you give up before even seeing a 30% return from the rebound. --- I just want to know how to judge where the bottom of extreme pessimism really is. --- Using time to buy space sounds easy, but how much do the interest and time costs actually eat up? --- Does anyone really make money following this routine, or is it just another set of talking points? --- Batching is correct, but the premise is that you have enough capital. --- You only recover your principal after doubling, and during this period, it’s several months of waiting.

View OriginalReply0