2026-01-12 13:22:12

Recently, the first quarter leaderboard results of a well-known project were released, and the community's reactions can be described as polarized. On one hand, everyone is curious about the ranking strategy—after all, these kinds of rankings always spark quite a bit of discussion. On the other hand, although a project ranked 150th didn't shine brightly, considering the effort and social media activity, the team's execution is still quite solid.

Interestingly, many community members mentioned that if they want to achieve better positions in such evaluations, relying solely on the project's inherent strength isn't enough. Placing orders to inflate trading volume has become no secret in the market. Everyone is competing fiercely, and the competition is indeed intense.

However, what truly attracts attention is the subsequent development. Many participants are looking forward to good news regarding token issuance in the first quarter. If the token can truly be launched as planned, then these rankings and activities in the early stages might just be the beginning. By then, whether the project can fulfill its promises will be the final measure the market will judge.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-12 21:02

The leaderboard is really a joke. Anyone can manipulate the view count, but the key is when the token will go live.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-12 16:39

ngl the ranking theater is just smoke and mirrors... real alchemy happens when tokens actually drop, not when volume gets conjured 🔮

Reply0

StealthMoon

· 01-12 13:51

Rankings are all fake; it's just a matter of waiting for the token to land. --- Rolling around, it's still about who can tell the best story; real tokens are seen with actual action. --- So what if you're 150th? Having execution power is more valuable than any ranking. --- Using fake orders to inflate volume is really tired; it's better to focus energy on the product. --- The day the token goes live is the real test; right now, it's all pointless. --- Community polarization is normal; anyway, I only care about when the token will arrive. --- Having solid execution is good; at least it's more reliable than empty projects. --- Talking openly about fake trading volume, but no one believes it anymore.

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 01-12 13:46

Rankings are just for entertainment; who doesn't know the tricks to boost views? Let's wait until the tokens actually land before talking. What's the point of being ranked so high now? Whether solid execution is just hype or genuine, you'll know once you see it. It's competitive, but I just want to know if the tokens this quarter can come on time. These kinds of rankings always polarize opinions; it's mainly about stirring up hype. The real focus should be on the token launch.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 01-12 13:43

There's not much to say about being ranked 150; what really matters is when the token will actually be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 01-12 13:40

Rankings are temporary; what really matters is whether the tokens can be redeemed when they are implemented. Placing orders to inflate volume has indeed become a common practice in the industry. In simple terms, everyone is competing together. For the project in 150th place, I think if they have strong execution, there is a lot of room for a comeback later. Token issuance is the real dividing line; only then can we see who has genuine value.

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 01-12 13:33

Rankings are really unreliable; fake orders have become standard practice. To be honest, it still depends on whether the token can be launched on time. The project in 150th place has excellent execution; now it's just a matter of whether they can deliver in the future. Everyone is competing; in the end, the market will decide who is genuine and who is fake. Instead of focusing on rankings, it's better to wait until the token is actually implemented.

View OriginalReply0