2026-01-12 13:21:31

Constantly troubled by wash trading and false breakouts? The problem may not be your judgment, but rather the lack of a comprehensive information dimension.

Valuescan uses multi-dimensional data verification to filter out noise—only selecting trading signals that can stand the test. Just look at recent performance: River up 59.88%, CLO gained 32.87%, and even B increased by 26.81%. These are not luck; they are based on solid data analysis.

If you only want to monitor some tokens' movements, basic features are enough. But to fully monitor the entire chain market and unlock all filtering dimensions? Upgrading to SVIP is necessary to truly grasp the market rhythm. After all, in this market, information gaps mean profit gaps.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkYouPayMe

· 9h ago

Here comes the same old trick to cut leeks again, who wouldn't boast about beautiful data That 59 points for River, was it really a sweep or just a lucky wave? Not saying It's called multi-dimensional screening in a nice way, but actually it's just to make you upgrade to SVIP to see all 😅 information. The information gap is indeed a profit, but do you really understand how this information gap is created?

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 16h ago

ngl the "multidimensional data" pitch hits different when you're already down 40% from last week... anyway those gains look sus, lemme see the regression analysis on that lmao

Reply0

DAOdreamer

· 16h ago

This data looks quite tempting, but is that 59.88% for River really filtered out by Valuescan? Or was it supposed to rise in the first place? Upgrading to SVIP is the only way to make money—I've heard this trick somewhere before. Information gap = profit gap. That's true, but the premise is that there actually is an information gap, right?

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizeMe

· 16h ago

The data looks good, but these returns are probably chosen by Valuescan itself, right? I want to see the real backtest data.

View OriginalReply0

SadMoneyMeow

· 16h ago

It's the same story again—beautiful data, but I'm worried it's selectively displayed. I've seen this kind of increase many times; let's see next time. Wait, does SVIP mean you have to pay to make money? Information gap equals profit gap, that's true, but tool fees are also a cost difference.

View OriginalReply0