There is an interesting phenomenon in the trading market: the more you learn, the faster you tend to lose money. Recently, US non-farm payroll data fell below expectations, increasing market volatility. This is actually a test of your trading system.



A trader shared a case: starting with a capital of 30,000, he turned it into 120,000 in two years, then doubled to 600,000 in one year, and finally reached 10 million in the last five months. It sounds incredible, but the underlying logic is quite simple— the speed of making money is inversely related to the frequency of trades.

The core methodology of this trader is to strictly follow the N-shaped pattern: vertical surge, diagonal pullback, then vertical breakout. Enter the trade with a 2% stop loss and a 10% take profit. Even with only a 35% win rate, continuous execution remains profitable. Why? Because risk is fixed, profit has a boundary, and probability theory will automatically give you the answer.

The operation process is extremely simple: open the exchange at 9:50 AM every day, review the 4-hour chart, and if you don’t see the N pattern, just shut down. If you do see it, place an order and then do your own thing. No indicator clutter, no drawing all kinds of trend lines, no chasing news—just rely on the 20-day moving average to select the direction. The entire operation takes 5 minutes, leaving 23 hours and 55 minutes for coffee, walking the dog, or studying the next trading cycle.

Just follow these three iron rules: don’t chase the rise, don’t hold onto losing positions, and don’t fight the market. Many people's losses come from these three words. When market sentiment fluctuates (for example, during adjustments caused by poor non-farm data), sticking to these three rules becomes a protective umbrella.

The core insight of this methodology is one sentence: simplify complex trading logic into repeatable actions, and execute simple rules to the extreme. Most people fail because they think too much and make things too complicated.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 01-12 12:51
30,000 to 10 million sounds like a story, but this N-shaped pattern is indeed fierce—it really tests human nature. Most people get wiped out at the moment of chasing the rally.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbievip
· 01-12 12:48
That's right, it's this principle. The more you study, the more chaotic it gets, really. --- From 30,000 to 10 million sounds unbelievable, but this discipline is indeed tough. --- Don't chase the rise, don't hold onto losing positions, don't fight battles—sounds simple, but actually doing it can be deadly. --- An N-shaped pattern with a 2% stop loss and 10% take profit is enough. I feel it's much more reliable than those flashy indicators. --- Finishing in 5 minutes every day, then spending the rest of the time walking the dog and drinking coffee—that's what it means to know how to play. --- A 35% win rate can actually guarantee profits, which shows it's not just luck. I understand this logic. --- When non-farm data comes out, you still need to stick to the rules; otherwise, you're just giving away money. --- I used to overthink and make things complicated. Now, looking at this approach, it really has some inspiration. --- Using the 20-day moving average to filter the direction is enough. All those fancy tricks are really traps.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoiavip
· 01-12 12:48
It's the same N-shaped pattern story again... It sounds good, but how many people can truly stick to the three ironclad rules? It sounds right, but I still don't believe anyone can really trade for 5 minutes a day and not look at the market for the remaining 23 hours and 55 minutes. How strong must their psychological resilience be? A 35% win rate can guarantee a win? That's an ideal scenario where risk and reward are completely fixed. In reality, who can guarantee to strictly follow a 2% stop loss and 10% take profit every time? One emotional breakdown and all efforts are lost. What's the use of just obsessing over the N pattern? The key is whether you can resist chasing the rally at that moment—that's the hardest part. Black swan events like non-farm payroll data, no matter how perfect the trading system, will suffer losses. It's easy to say that because you've never experienced a margin call explosion.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 01-12 12:46
30,000 to 10 million sounds like a story, but indeed some people have made money through rigid execution. I also tried the complex indicator stacking approach, and it crashed... Now I just focus on the N pattern and stop-loss and take-profit, fewer operations actually help me live longer. Making money is actually about doing nothing, which is a bit counterintuitive. Learning a lot doesn't necessarily mean earning more, I totally agree with that. The problem is most people can't stick to those three iron rules at all, and one wave of pullback causes their mentality to explode. A 35% win rate can still guarantee victory? The key is that risk management is really overlooked by most people; too many want to chase 1000 after earning 100. Not chasing the rise is the hardest part; watching others double and take off, you really have to hold back.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMastervip
· 01-12 12:27
This story sounds appealing, but I always feel like it's the same old routine... However, the combination of N-shaped pattern plus 2% stop loss is indeed something, much better than my previous chaotic approaches.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)