It is impossible for a leading exchange to allow the BNB ecosystem to bear X, no matter how great the benefits are. The underlying reason is still the strategic layout of American capital—just look at Sol's recent moves to understand. Wall Street capital has long been involved, and the ecosystem layout is clearly visible.
What is the real intention? If X is on BNB, it’s like handing a knife to the competitors. The recent collaboration between Sol and X essentially breaks the dominance of certain leading exchanges in suppressing mainstream public chains. The next stage of competition will shift to the blockchain itself.
To put it bluntly, whether you accept it or not, the absolute advantage of a certain leading exchange is gradually being dismantled, and this is the trend.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLady
· 12h ago
watching this unfold like a pending tx... the timing's sus ngl. if they actually let X settle on BNB, that's basically handing sol the whole narrative. already seeing the MEV implications play out, wall street's been front-running this move for months. architecture doesn't lie fr.
Reply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 12h ago
Well, it's still the same old Wall Street tricks, just with a different disguise to keep reaping profits.
Sol is indeed impressive this time, but don't get too high on it. Once the pattern truly shifts to the chain, who will win is still up in the air.
As for the BNB ecosystem, it was originally locked down by a certain institution, and it's only a matter of time before the situation breaks open.
Is it really a great trend? I think we need to wait another two months. It's too early to draw conclusions now.
In the game of ecosystem competition, honestly, whoever has more money and more people wins—there's no other secret.
But on the other hand, the pattern is definitely changing, I have to admit that.
The monopolistic model of a certain institution is outdated, and this reshuffle might really be coming.
If you insist on saying who wins and who loses, it's really hard to tell right now. It depends on how things play out later.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 12h ago
My thoughts:
1. Same old rhetoric, rest assured, the exchange profit cake isn't that easy to divide.
2. Sol has indeed been impressive this time, but does Wall Street really foolish enough to hand over the handle?
3. Instead of focusing on who suppresses whom, it's better to look at the real activity level of on-chain ecosystems.
4. The BNB ecosystem foundation is there, not so easy to shake.
5. We've been hearing that the trend is inevitable for three years, but market discourse power is still in the hands of the whales.
6. On-chain competition will indeed intensify, but the shift in pattern won't happen so quickly.
7. Haha, analyzing the power game—patterns are always changing.
8. Basically, whoever holds the discourse power wins; right now, it's still just talk.
9. This logic has many flaws—can US capital really break the monopoly?
10. Hmm, the era of centralized exchanges indeed should be over.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 12h ago
Wake up, the BNB ecosystem has long been marginalized and that's a given.
Yeah, Wall Street's game is indeed ruthless; it's not that easy for Sol to rise.
The pattern has really shifted onto the chain; the old exchange model is outdated.
Those who are only now realizing this are probably late to the game.
To be honest, I've seen through the US capital's strategic layout for a long time.
If you can't get X onto BNB, you know someone is backing down.
The trend is unstoppable, brother.
This wave of competition has indeed changed; it's different now.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 12h ago
Haha, still talking about BNB not going to X. I just want to know when we can truly see the chain battle upgrade. CZ's move is indeed a bit conservative.
One mistake leads to another, SOL has long been eaten up.
It's really hard to say who the final winner will be in this reshuffle. The days of centralized exchanges are indeed coming to an end.
I'm skeptical about X building an on-chain ecosystem, but they are indeed trying to break the deadlock.
But well, let's wait and see. These shifts in sentiment usually involve repeated tug-of-war.
Wall Street folks just know how to manipulate emotions. The BNB ecosystem isn't bad either.
On-chain competition is indeed here, but don't jump to conclusions too quickly. It's still early.
I'm more concerned about who will survive in the end. This round of elimination won't be gentle.
SOL has really seized the window of opportunity this time; timing is crucial.
It is impossible for a leading exchange to allow the BNB ecosystem to bear X, no matter how great the benefits are. The underlying reason is still the strategic layout of American capital—just look at Sol's recent moves to understand. Wall Street capital has long been involved, and the ecosystem layout is clearly visible.
What is the real intention? If X is on BNB, it’s like handing a knife to the competitors. The recent collaboration between Sol and X essentially breaks the dominance of certain leading exchanges in suppressing mainstream public chains. The next stage of competition will shift to the blockchain itself.
To put it bluntly, whether you accept it or not, the absolute advantage of a certain leading exchange is gradually being dismantled, and this is the trend.