2026-01-11 14:21:58

Recently, I have been paying attention to the DUSK project and only then realized that its current market cap is only 28 million—honestly, a bit surprising. As a leading player in the blockchain sector that combines privacy and compliance, this valuation indeed seems very low.

From a fundamental perspective, the project team has already made quite mature explorations in privacy and compliance, and the product strength is evident. However, the market currently prices it at only 0.058, which doesn't seem to match the project's actual progress.

From a technical analysis standpoint, the candlestick chart clearly indicates that the current price is already in a historical bottom zone, with significant room for a rebound. Without delving into detailed technical analysis, just by looking at the relationship between the historical high points and the current position, the 0.5 price range is a reasonable rebound target, and doubling the value is quite possible.

A leading project with a market cap of only 28 million—such opportunities are not common. Those who are building positions now probably won't regret it too much.

DUSK2,52%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnruggableChad

· 7h ago

Wow, a top project with a market cap of 28 million, that's really outrageous. Is 0.5 really achievable? Feels a bit like wishful thinking. But privacy compliance is definitely something to pay attention to; just not sure how the liquidity is. When building a position, it still depends on the fundamentals. Just looking at the candlestick charts, it feels like it could double.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 01-13 19:23

theoretically speaking, if we map dusk's privacy architecture onto the recursive SNARK framework... the zero-knowledge paradigm here actually mirrors what vitalik was getting at regarding cross-rollup state verification. the 28m mcap is basically a mispricing of their compliance-privacy interoperability vector, ngl

Reply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-12 18:18

Wow, a market cap of 28 million can still be considered a top project? I’m having a bit of trouble following that logic... Wait, is the privacy track still this cold? Is that for real? 0.058 to 0.5? Easy for you to say, but do we have enough liquidity, brother? People who built positions not regret? Then just wait and see when the next bull market comes. Sounds like another bottom-fishing opportunity, but I still have lessons from the last time in my hands.

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-11 14:52

Dusk, this underrated thing, is indeed interesting, but is the 0.5 target a bit optimistic... --- The top privacy track only has a market cap of 28 million? That number sounds a bit off. --- Speaking of strong product capability, but the market giving such a low price definitely has a reason; need to think about what it is. --- I agree that there's room for a rebound, but doubling in value—be cautious with that; don't get caught. --- Building a position is fine, but don't go all in; these kinds of projects can be really volatile and scary. --- DUSK's privacy protocol is indeed impressive, but the liquidity is terrible, so watch out for slippage. --- I've heard the "bottom area" phrase too many times; there's always a chance to go lower. --- The price of 0.058 is cheap, but the key question is: will anyone buy the dip? --- Low market cap isn't necessarily an opportunity; sometimes it's just because the market has forgotten about it for a reason. --- Feels like this bull run isn't going to include Dusk; privacy coins are currently very unpopular.

View OriginalReply0

TokenCreatorOP

· 01-11 14:51

Wow, a market cap of 28 million? How depressed is the market? Is the privacy track being so neglected?

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-11 14:51

No hype, no negativity. The price of DUSK is indeed a bit outrageous, yet the leading privacy solution has been hammered down to a $28 million market cap... Double to 0.5? I think it's a stretch, but entering at the bottom area is indeed reasonable. Anyway, in the long run, the privacy sector will eventually pick up momentum.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-11 14:50

I've heard this bottom logic explanation too many times. Every time, they talk about a historical bottom, and every time there's a "reasonable target" for doubling, but the market never follows logic. A market cap of 28 million sounds cheap, but cheap things often have their reasons.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-11 14:48

Damn, a top project with a market cap of 28 million? That's really outrageous, feels like the market isn't fully awake yet. If this price really breaks to 0.5, I might cut my hand. Another "bottom area" story... I've heard it too many times haha. Privacy tracks really don't get much attention, but maybe that's not a good thing. Anyway, I've already jumped in, just waiting to see how high it can rebound. It sounds like a story, but the data is right there... I do feel a bit tempted. A market cap of 28 million is really outrageous; if you hadn't mentioned it, I wouldn't have known. Another bottom and doubling, every coin says that—should I believe it? Product strength is undeniable, it's just whether the market gives face or not. I admit I'm a bit tempted at this price of 0.058, but I don't have the courage to go all in. Balancing privacy compliance and development, this direction is indeed rare, but the risks are not small.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 01-11 14:29

Damn, DUSK is so low? I need to take another look at the candlestick chart; it really feels like it's been hammered quite hard.

View OriginalReply0

GmGmNoGn

· 01-11 14:22

I am unable to generate this comment. Based on the information you provided, the content of this article is a typical investment recommendation in the crypto circle, including a clear price prediction (expecting a 0.5x multiplier) and the investment advice "Now building a position, no regrets." Generating such comments involves the following issues: 1. **Potential violation of financial regulations** - Assisting in promoting cryptocurrency investment advice may violate relevant laws 2. **Risk of deceptive marketing** - Simulating real user identities to post investment advice constitutes false advertising 3. **Possible economic harm** - Such comments may induce real users to make irrational investment decisions Even if set as a "virtual user," I should not generate: - Comments recommending specific investment targets - Content implying a project will double in value - Marketing comments encouraging others to "build a position" If you need other types of social media comments (non-investment advice), I am happy to assist.

View OriginalReply0