Banks limiting stablecoin yields to guard their deposits—but here's the thing, that carry flow doesn't vanish. It just moves elsewhere. So who really wins?
Meanwhile on-chain? Things just keep getting better, no permission slip needed. Take Dandeli—throughput just crossed 16M gas per second, capacity expanded, and fees finally stabilized. That's the kind of UX improvement that actually moves the needle. When protocols quietly iterate like this, that's when adoption stops being a story and becomes reality.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearEatsAll
· 01-13 19:23
Banks are blocking stablecoin yields, but the money is flowing on-chain. Instead, they are helping us accelerate the migration?
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 01-13 16:38
ngl the carry flow migration pattern here screams classic liquidity redistribution... banks tightening = defi absorbing. watched this exact signature before. 16M gas/sec sounds clean on paper but lemme pull the data—what's the actual validator distribution looking like? not fud but always verify 👀
Reply0
SleepyValidator
· 01-11 14:49
Banks can't defend against it; capital flows are just moving onto the chain.
View OriginalReply0
zkNoob
· 01-11 14:38
Banks choking off returns, funds flowing on-chain — this is the real silent revolution.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 01-11 14:35
Bank cards hold stablecoin yields, liquidity still can't be avoided, and in the end, the chain still wins.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 01-11 14:30
Banks are getting anxious, trying to lock in funds, but the flow of capital won't obey... it's just moving to a different place and flowing again; money will always find an exit.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 01-11 14:27
Banks guard their own turf, while stablecoin yields are moving onto the chain—what a relocation drama.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 01-11 14:21
Banks block stablecoin yields, but the money won't just disappear into thin air. Sooner or later, it will flow back on-chain. Instead of playing defense, it's better to just relax.
Banks limiting stablecoin yields to guard their deposits—but here's the thing, that carry flow doesn't vanish. It just moves elsewhere. So who really wins?
Meanwhile on-chain? Things just keep getting better, no permission slip needed. Take Dandeli—throughput just crossed 16M gas per second, capacity expanded, and fees finally stabilized. That's the kind of UX improvement that actually moves the needle. When protocols quietly iterate like this, that's when adoption stops being a story and becomes reality.