The arena of decentralized storage has been quite turbulent lately. In this field, Walrus Protocol has carved out a new approach with a revolutionary technical architecture. As its native token, WAL is undertaking an ambitious mission—to build an efficient, secure, and programmable storage ecosystem.



The most telling evidence is still those cold, hard numbers.

Walrus uses the Red-Stuff encoding technology, which completely rewrites the cost ledger of decentralized storage. Did you know? Just a 4-5x replication factor can ensure high data availability. Compare this to traditional players: Filecoin requires 25x redundancy, Arweave is even more extreme, needing 100-1000x. Just this alone is revolutionary.

Let's do the math: how much does 1TB of data cost per year? Arweave needs $3,500, Filecoin fluctuates between $200-$1,000, and Walrus only costs $50. The cost difference reaches 70-100 times. And this isn’t about lowering security standards—even if two-thirds of storage nodes fail simultaneously, data can still be recovered.

Even more interesting, Walrus has introduced a new feature called "programmable storage." With the support of the Sui ecosystem, it’s not just a cold data warehouse, but a storage engine that can directly integrate into application logic and be flexibly called upon. This kind of imagination space is something traditional storage protocols have never even considered.
WAL1,19%
FIL6,71%
AR10,18%
SUI2,84%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WenAirdropvip
· 5h ago
Damn, the cost difference is huge. Is Arweave still affordable for individuals at $3500 a year? Walrus at $50 is a direct blow, but how come Reed-Solomon is so powerful?
View OriginalReply0
MelonFieldvip
· 15h ago
$50 a year? That number is ridiculous, feels like bragging.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTradervip
· 01-11 13:54
50 USD a year? That number sounds ridiculous. We need to run some actual data to see if it aligns. But if they can really cut down this cost, the folks at FileCoin won't be able to sit still.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryvip
· 01-11 13:50
$50 a year for 1TB? Damn, the cost is way too crazy. What's with Arweave's $3500?
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveragedvip
· 01-11 13:44
$50 a year? Is this number real? Feels like bragging. --- Filecoin is getting nervous this time, not only due to crushing costs but also with Sui's support. --- Programmable storage sounds good, but can it really be implemented? --- Red Dot encoding technology is so powerful? Why haven't I heard of it before? --- Wait, two-thirds of nodes fail and can still recover? That's a bit too insecure. --- Just want to know when Walrus can be truly used. Right now, it's still in the conceptual stage. --- Cost difference of 70 times? Then Arweave and Filecoin should be renamed "High-Price Storage." --- How is the outlook for the WAL token? Is anyone buying it? --- Programmable storage + Sui ecosystem, this combination definitely sparks imagination. --- Redstuff encoding? Feels like every project claims to have a revolutionary technology.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)