2026-01-11 12:27:49

Just closed a $LIT position. This trade involved a scale of $340 and ultimately yielded about $3 in profit, with a return of approximately 1%. Market fluctuations are rapid, so it's important to stay updated with market trends and wait for the next trading opportunity. Sometimes small gains are better than big losses; consistently executing the trading plan is the key.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CrossChainBreather

· 16h ago

$340 only earns $3, this move is a bit... forget it, as long as I'm alive.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-13 01:38

1% return... Let me see the data, how large must the cost pressure be at this trading scale to make it worthwhile 2. Small profits are better than big losses, that's true, but can this return cover slip and gas? Needs further verification 3. Taking a $3 profit on a $340 position... there's a misconception here, need to see what the actual risk-adjusted return is 4. The statement about timely market pulse follow-up is quite vague, what specific signals trigger the close position? 5. From an engineering perspective, consistent execution ≠ blind execution, strategy parameters need regular backtesting 6. Just 1%... honestly, I find it hard to believe that trading costs wouldn't eat up 50% 7. The trading direction is correct, right? Isn't it just stop-loss escape? 8. Interesting discovery: even during such volatile market periods, stable arbitrage is possible. The underlying logic is worth in-depth research 9. Small profits are indeed better than liquidation, but in the long run, can this return rate support the input-output ratio? 10. Wait, is the recent trend of LIT really stable, or is luck playing a big role?

View OriginalReply0

RamenStacker

· 01-11 12:57

1% profit is also profit. Not losing is earning. Keep executing steadily.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-11 12:57

ah, the classic 1% trade cycle... statistically speaking, this is exactly how the dot-com survivors operated in 2002 before the next pump wave hit. *checks notes* small wins compound, sure, but have you charted how many traders followed this playbook before getting absolutely rekt on the next capitulation phase?

Reply0

BearMarketHustler

· 01-11 12:57

Small gains are still gains. Taking $3 out of $340, I think it's okay. The main thing is to come out alive.

View OriginalReply0

tokenomics_truther

· 01-11 12:55

1% return? Is that what you call "stable execution"? I think it's just stable being taken advantage of, haha.

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-11 12:54

Only earning 3 yuan out of 340... I've been through it all, and this is what it feels like to survive in a bear market. But compared to the bunch of naive investors who got completely trapped in 2018, knowing when to exit definitely means lasting longer. The question is, where is the next opportunity?

View OriginalReply0

ForumMiningMaster

· 01-11 12:51

Just earning 3 is much better than losing.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-11 12:45

1% return... Based on on-chain data analysis, the risk-adjusted returns of this kind of micro-profit trading are actually quite considerable. It is worth noting that the volatility of $LIT has recently increased significantly. Closing a position is closing, and having a stop-loss mindset is indeed much clearer than those pursuing huge profits. Playing with a 340U position to achieve 1% return feels a bit conservative. Can you test a more aggressive leverage configuration? The key is execution. Many people have perfect plans but lack discipline. Your consistent follow-through is indeed the right way. From three dimensions—risk management, timeliness, and mental stability—you have some samples, but the sample size is still not enough. Continue tracking data. Small profits indeed beat big losses, but I want to know how your Sharpe ratio is for this wave. This is the true art of trading. Many people have sharp eyes but low skills; consistently executing ordinary plans is much more rewarding than gambling-style operations.

View OriginalReply0