A recent international case has sparked considerable discussion in the crypto community. The political turmoil in Venezuela seems unrelated to the crypto market at first glance, but the underlying financial sanctions and the covert links to cryptocurrency have significant implications for investors.



The story begins in 2018. Once the U.S. imposed economic sanctions on Venezuela, the dollar settlement channels were completely shut down. The local currency, the Bolivar, fell into a vicious inflationary cycle—people received their wages and had to exchange them for USD or stablecoins on the same day; any delay would result in severe devaluation. Faced with this dilemma, the Venezuelan government decided to take a bold step: issuing the world's first sovereign-backed cryptocurrency—the Petro, claiming each token was backed by one barrel of oil, in an attempt to break through the financial sanctions blockade.

This move deeply angered the United States. The Trump administration immediately signed an executive order banning all U.S. involvement in Petro transactions and usage, labeling it as a tool to circumvent sanctions. While this conflict appeared to be a geopolitical power struggle between major nations, it subtly altered the operational logic of the crypto market. When sovereign states begin to use cryptocurrencies to counteract traditional financial system restrictions, the entire market's rules of the game are fundamentally changing.

Now, the key question is: where are the reserves of those Petro tokens from back then now? Is it possible that some hidden crypto assets still exist? Could these assets be frozen or seized in future international legal proceedings? These questions could trigger chain reactions affecting BTC, stablecoins, and the entire crypto asset market's liquidity.

From a market perspective, this type of event reveals a deeper trend: cryptocurrencies are becoming a new battleground in geopolitical struggles. Whether for sanctions evasion, asset protection, or financial independence, more and more countries and institutions are re-evaluating the role of digital assets. For long-term investors, this means paying closer attention to macro political and international financial landscapes, rather than just focusing on candlestick charts.
BTC1,89%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-e51e87c7vip
· 23h ago
The story of the oil coin is really wild. Thinking about it now, it's quite ironic. Basically, when the US doesn't want to play with the dollar, Venezuela starts using crypto, and then the US turns around and bans crypto too. This kind of套路 has long been seen in the crypto world. As for those oil coins, I really don't know where they are now. Maybe they're still hidden? If they really get frozen, how good would the liquidity look? It seems that in the future, we need to pay attention to political trends. Just looking at K-line charts is really not enough. Who is right? The term "new geopolitical battlefield" is quite fitting. The crypto world has never been clean.
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forevervip
· 01-12 12:05
Is anyone still chasing the oil coin thing... Feels like it's long sunk into the sea It was hyped up pretty aggressively at first, but in the end, just a bunch of chaos That logic can be applied to a lot of current shitcoins haha Even government-backed coins can be messed up, so what are we really expecting? Honestly, most retail investors can't see through the macro politics involved, better to just hold coins honestly The impact of sanctions on on-chain assets is underestimated, be cautious about long-term holding Oil coin → Stablecoin → BTC, the chain reaction sounds a bit scary... but it's definitely worth thinking about Sovereign countries dare to play with coins, what does that mean? This game isn't that simple Asset freezes should be guarded against; although blockchain is immutable, politics can bypass everything Venezuela's case is a warning, don't be fooled by the free nature of coins
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 01-11 12:49
Regarding Oil Coin, I knew it was a trap long ago. Basically, it's a pawn in geopolitical chess, and the crypto community has been forcibly dragged into the great power game. Over in the US, they say ban, then ban; retail investors like us still have to pay the price for their decisions.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryingvip
· 01-11 12:46
The thing with Oil Coin, we should have figured it out long ago—where exactly is this money flowing to?
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueenvip
· 01-11 12:46
The oil coin thing, to put it simply, is a government-level rug pull. Are there still people who trust government-backed coins? Haha
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 01-11 12:39
OilCoin has truly become a mystery now. Where exactly has this asset gone? The US sanctions are very strict, and the rules of the crypto world changed from that moment on. If the liquidity of stablecoins is really impacted, we need to take a good look at the macro situation. Using the crypto space as a chessboard for geopolitical strategies, this game is far from over. If sanctions can be bypassed with encryption to serve as a fallback, it indicates that the value of the coin has already been seen through.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBotvip
· 01-11 12:26
Does anyone still believe in the oil coin scheme? It should have been in the museum long ago.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)