2026-01-11 12:20:38

When it comes to projects supported by leading exchanges' Labs, many people still have some impression. Especially since this project was also selected for the second phase of the Megadrop program — which is not something you can achieve by just throwing money around.

According to reports, the exchange invested a total of 10 million USD. The question is: what justifies such a large-scale investment?

The reasons are actually solid.

First, the BNB Chain ecosystem urgently needs a truly censorship-resistant decentralized stablecoin to fill the gap. FDUSD is good, but fundamentally it is a centralized product. The ecosystem needs a decentralized puzzle piece to improve the entire financial infrastructure — this funding round is aimed at filling that gap.

Second, liquidity issues. The exchange holds a massive amount of BNB, but simply hoarding these assets is meaningless. A healthy ecosystem should have active liquidity, not a stagnant pool. Through staking mechanisms, these BNB can generate yields while continuing to circulate within the ecosystem — this is the smart way to play.

You see, this 10 million USD investment is not for an ordinary project; it’s about laying the financial foundation for the entire BNB Chain.

So don’t see these tokens as just ordinary altcoins. On the BNB Chain, they have a "legitimate" status as official projects. Working with such projects increases the chances of surviving through multiple cycles. That’s the core logic of investment.

BNB3,18%

FDUSD0,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fomo_fighter

· 18h ago

Investing 10 million to fill the ecological gap, this logic is indeed more reliable than most projects. The BNB Chain game plan is quite sophisticated.

View OriginalReply0

BankruptWorker

· 22h ago

10 million dollars poured in, this is definitely not small-scale... I am optimistic about the direction of anti-censorship stablecoins. --- Exactly right, BNB Chain indeed lacks such a thing, and the logic of filling the ecological gap can be valid. --- Living water vs dead water, I like this metaphor... Exchanges are also playing the circular economy themselves. --- The idea of an orthodox identity is interesting, but whether it can survive several cycles really depends on the project itself. --- Staking BNB to generate yields, this gameplay is indeed smarter than just letting the coins lie around... but what if liquidity dries up? --- I just want to know when this kind of project can break out of the circle; is it interesting to just play on the chain? --- Oh wow, another project endorsed by Labs, alright, I'll hop on and take a look.

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter

· 01-11 12:43

10 million dollars poured in is essentially repairing ecological vulnerabilities; this logic indeed holds up. --- With so many projects on the BNB chain, only a few truly have "orthodox credentials," no wonder they dare to go all in. --- Speaking of which, decentralized stablecoins have always been an empty spot; it seems exchanges are also getting anxious. --- Living water vs. stagnant water—this metaphor I like. BNB lying around is not as good as making it move to earn returns. --- The question is, how can ordinary retail investors follow? Where do we get 10 million dollars? --- The second phase of Megadrop has been selected, indicating that the project itself has substance, not just a capital game. --- Decentralized stablecoins that resist censorship? Sounds great, but these projects also carry significant risks. --- Following projects from leading exchanges can reduce risks, but don’t expect to get rich overnight.

View OriginalReply0

PoetryOnChain

· 01-11 12:39

The words sound nice, but did they really invest 10 million? Just hearing about funding news is making me numb.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 01-11 12:38

1. Spending 10 million just to pave the way, nothing mysterious about it 2. Wait a minute, can decentralized stablecoins really beat FDUSD? I'm a bit skeptical 3. This logic sounds smooth, but can the issue of censorship resistance really be implemented 4. It's a pity that BNB just lying around isn't being used; activating liquidity really hits home for me 5. The regular army? Ha, still depends on whether it can make money 6. The staking mechanism is indeed clever, but what about the risks? Not mentioned 7. The probability of surviving several cycles is high... this standard is too lenient 8. Filling in the blank is fine, but is this blank value worth filling in 9. I believe it's not an ordinary project, but can regular token holders share the dividends 10. The ecosystem foundation sounds awesome, but I just want to know how much can be earned

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-11 12:38

Wait a minute, I need to analyze the flow of this 10 million funds... According to on-chain data, the address activity pattern after this money went in is quite interesting. Really? The narrative of decentralized stablecoins sounds very glamorous, but tracking through multiple addresses shows that the liquidity mining data doesn't match up. This isn't investment logic; it's a typical ecosystem self-circulating wash trading. BNB is stacked in and then flows out from staking. I had already guessed that.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-11 12:32

With 10 million USD invested, this guy is right, ecological positioning really needs to be strategic. The BNB chess game is becoming clearer; decentralized stablecoins are truly urgently needed. I've been optimistic about this route for a long time. The official army and altcoins are indeed different; the probability of surviving cycles... that's the difference. Holding BNB and waiting for the opportunity, the live water model is the real skill. Alright, I believe it. It's that kind of statement again—exchanges won't invest casually. Being selected for Megadrop Phase 2 is valuable in itself. Liquidity tools are well-designed, and BNB can turn around nicely. This logic is solid. Watching this layout, it's much more promising than reckless projects. Decentralized positioning, staking cycles, and infrastructure improvements—details are handled properly. Sticking with the official army is more reliable than chasing risky projects. The cycle of survival is exactly this principle. Building financial infrastructure components is much more hardcore than just throwing money into marketing.

View OriginalReply0