Is the turning point of crypto finance here?

Rece

Question

NotSatoshi · Accepted Answer

The words sound good, but the key is whether the institutions will really put their money where their mouth is and follow through. Just shouting slogans is useless.

---

Once again, a signal has been released. Retail investors, it's time to take the plunge, haha.

---

Short-term speculation is more likely; it's safer to wait and get on board later.

---

On-chain implementation has always been a shortcoming; even the best policies are useless without practical application.

---

$FIR $MM $AA  Do these have any fundamental support, or are they just pure concept hype?

---

People who believe in this wave are probably already trapped; if it could really reverse, it would have done so long ago.

---

Friendly policies ≠ market takeoff. As I always say, without institutional follow-up, it's just a castle in the air.

---

Long-term optimism for on-chain finance, but in the short term, risk prevention is necessary. Who can grasp this rhythm?

---

It sounds nice, but then they turn around and dump the market. I've seen this happen many times.

---

This kind of window period is usually a good time for the main players to cut the leeks. Be careful.

Gm_Gn_Merchant · Answer

Ha, high-level statements are indeed fierce, but let's see how institutional funds follow up... It still depends on real money talking.

---

Nice words, now it's just waiting to see who dares to go all in.

---

Good signals are good, but I'm afraid it's another round of leek farmers getting caught in the trap.

---

No need to talk so much, just ask one question—can this last like 2017?

---

On-chain implementation is the real way, shouting slogans is useless.

---

Friendly policies ≠ financial freedom, being cautious is not wrong.

---

I just want to know if this is really a window of opportunity or if it's just another leek-cutting scam.

QuietlyStaking · Answer

Really? There are a bunch of positive signals, but where is the real money from institutions? It still seems like public opinion is leading the way.

Honestly, short-term speculation is more likely; on-chain implementation still needs to be waited on.

Policy friendliness is one thing, but ultimately it depends on whether real applications can be supported. Just shouting slogans is useless now.

During this window period, I remain observant and want to see who is truly making moves.

It feels like the bear market story is being exaggerated again. Let's wait until actual funds enter the market.

A loud voice does not equal a trend reversal; this principle still needs to be understood.

StableBoi · Answer

Sounds good, but my main concern is still when the real money will come in.

---

Speaking of this wave of policy dividends, if they can truly translate into institutional buying, that would be interesting... Right now, it's mostly talk.

---

For long-term bets, it still depends on whether the actual on-chain user base grows; otherwise, it's all just castles in the air.

---

The turning point? Probably just another prelude to a harvest of naive investors... Anyway, I'll stay steady and wait until real applications come out.

---

High-level statements do give confidence, but execution is the real test. Let's wait and see.

---

I won't touch short-term speculation anymore, it's too exhausting. Better to see which projects are actually doing something.

---

These major good news are usually smoke screens before the main players dump... Not the first time I've seen this trick.

---

Good question, but what's the real idea? No one really knows the next move; everyone is just gambling.

---

If institutional funds were truly coming in, they would have bought already. What does the current calm mean? I have a sense of it.

---

The new on-chain financial engine sounds smooth, but what about the ecosystem applications? Still relying on coin speculation.

DaoResearcher · Answer

Based on the voting data of governance proposals, such policy signals often cause short-term sentiment premiums, but lack the support of on-chain real TVL growth.

To be honest, while the voices are loud, I care more about the flow of funds. From the data performance, the pace of institutional capital entering is still lagging.

The problem of incentive incompatibility has reappeared... Public opinion heat ≠ market sustainability.

This round might be a typical Token Weighted Voting speculative cycle.

Trust me, first look at the whitepapers of mainstream projects' economic models before making a judgment.

Short-term speculation is tempting, but long-term success depends on application implementation. Most are still in the conceptual stage now.

AirdropNinja · Answer

Words sound nice, but where is the real money from institutions? I think we still have to wait.

---

High-level endorsement is good, but the key is application implementation.

---

Here we go again, how long can this round of hype last...

---

Surface-level good news is good, but it depends on whether funds will follow.

---

Long-term optimistic, but for now, let's just observe.

---

Sounds great, but in reality? Without real on-chain transaction volume, it's all talk.

---

I won't believe this is a real turning point until institutions step in.

---

Policy friendliness ≠ market must rise; that logic is flawed.

---

I just want to ask—can we stop cutting the leeks this time?

---

Loud voices, but what I care about is whether it can make money.

---

Same old tricks, just a different name, repeat again?

---

Let's see how long it stays hot before talking. Anyway, I'll get on board first and then analyze.

---

Just shouting "new engine" isn't enough; there must be real users and transaction volume to support it.

FlashLoanPhantom · Answer

The words sound nice, but have the institutions really put their real money into it? I think mostly it's just slogans over actions. We'll see when genuine capital flows in.

---

This kind of policy signal is a double-edged sword; when public opinion heats up, it easily becomes a tool for those who want to take over.

---

Don't be brainwashed by what the top executives say. The key is whether the applications can truly be implemented. Currently, most on-chain projects are still vaporware.

---

If traditional finance really collapses, the current stock exchanges should have closed down long ago. Why am I still doing well?

---

There will definitely be short-term hype, but how long can this enthusiasm last? I bet it will cool off before the end of the year.

---

Hey, have you noticed? This kind of voice is heard every year. We said similar things last year, and then what happened?

Rugpull幸存者 · Answer

High-level endorsements are just that—endorsements. But where is the real money from institutions? That's the core; just hype is useless.

Wait, how's the $MM situation lately? Is anyone paying attention?

To put it simply, it still depends on whether there are real applications being implemented; otherwise, it's just another round of IQ tax.

Fame and popularity come and go quickly. I've already been burned once.

Turning point? It depends on whether institutions follow up; otherwise, it's just self-congratulation.

LiquiditySurfer · Answer

The volume is high, but are institutions really entering the market? I see everyone is still on the sidelines. Is this a turning point or just another round of harvesting? Let's wait and see.

Is the turning point of crypto finance here?

Trending Topics

GateProofOfReservesReport

ChineseMemecoinBoom

CPIDataAhead

SOLPriceAnalysis

GateSquareCreatorNewYearIncentives

Hot Gate Fun

去月球

去月球

黄毛币

黄毛币

马币

马币

散户K线

散户K线

锦鲤币

锦鲤币

Pin