2026-01-11 11:29:24

There are many cross-chain solutions, but the key difference lies in who controls your assets. Traditional bridging methods either lock your BTC or use wrapped tokens, with rights managed centrally. There's an alternative approach: your assets always remain in your hands, with private keys and signing rights never transferred, while seamlessly entering the DeFi ecosystem to participate in lending, trading, and liquidity mining. This non-custodial model allows you to retain asset sovereignty without missing out on DeFi opportunities.

BTC1,98%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PoetryOnChain

· 12h ago

Someone finally said it: those lock-up schemes are really annoying. Wait, how can non-custodial solutions guarantee liquidity? Not transferring the private key sounds great, but what about gas fees? Do I have to cover those myself? This is what Web3 should look like—your own money should be under your control. No hype, no criticism—let's see how it works before judging.

View OriginalReply0

LightningLady

· 01-11 15:02

Sounds pretty good, but is it really possible to keep the private key unchanged and still access DeFi? How is it achieved? It feels a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-11 11:59

Sounds good, but can you really achieve cross-chain without moving the private key? What about the technical details? --- Non-custodial is indeed attractive, but is there enough liquidity? Can it really be as smooth as centralized bridges? --- Finally someone said this, tired of all the wrapped coin tricks --- I like this idea; controlling your own private key is the way to go --- Wait, if you don't transfer the private key, how is security guaranteed? Could it be a new risk point? --- Exactly, traditional bridging is a big pitfall; assets not in your hands, you can't sleep well --- It mainly depends on gas fees and speed. No matter how good the solution is, if it's expensive, it's useless --- Feels like another way of saying multi-signature or cross-chain verification --- Autonomy >收益, I agree with this priority --- If it really works, I have to try it. Most cross-chain today are just playing tricks

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-11 11:58

Sounds good, but can it really achieve cross-chain interaction without transferring private keys? I need to see the implementation details to believe it.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 01-11 11:53

Alright, this is what I wanted to see. Having control over your private keys is really awesome.

View OriginalReply0