Moving averages clustering often indicate a clear directional choice in the near future. Today, I want to break down this trading approach using WLFI's recent price movements as an example.



The core logic is actually simple: when the 20, 60, and 120-day moving averages are tightly packed together, it means the short- and medium-term price centers are aligned. Once broken, it tends to form a strong trend. WLFI has been rising from 0.17 for 7 days now, and the three moving averages are still densely clustered. The 20-day moving average (red line) has already started to turn upward, gradually rising each day. This provides us with a dynamic stop-loss opportunity— as the moving average moves up, the stop-loss point also moves up, and the risk-reward ratio naturally increases.

According to this rhythm, in about two weeks, the 20-day moving average will reach near the current price, meaning in two weeks, you can set your stop-loss close to the current price, and the upward space essentially becomes profit. This is the real "huge risk-reward ratio."

How to operate specifically? Divide the total planned position into 14 parts, buying one part each day. The advantage of this approach is— even if there is a sudden drop like recently, you only add two or three batches of positions, leaving about ten batches as backup to add later. If the price falls below MA20, then stop all losses and stop adding positions. As long as the moving averages remain densely packed, this strategy can be repeatedly used. Historically, in major cryptocurrencies, its success rate is actually quite good.

Talking about recent actual situations: around 0.176, I did get a bit carried away, chasing in with 600,000 USD, which quickly increased the position size. Yesterday, it dropped straight from 0.188 to 0.173. At the time, I thought it was a short-term blow-up, but the MA20 was not broken— just reduced some positions to ease anxiety. Today, I paused adding to the position as planned, partly because I was scared by the false breakout a couple of days ago, and partly because the current positions have already gained enough profit, so holding some cash feels more secure.

The midline now is at 0.1535, and tomorrow it’s expected to reach around 0.155. Each day, the stop-loss moves closer, and the risk-reward ratio gradually expands. This is the rhythm that should be maintained during the dense moving average phase.

This is just a sharing of a trading approach. Since the current position still has unrealized losses, consider this as a reference logic and do not follow blindly. Let’s see if WLFI can generate a satisfactory trend this time.
WLFI8,11%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsShamanvip
· 01-12 23:21
The moving average dense strategy sounds good, but smashing $600,000 all at once is indeed a bit reckless. --- Ma20 not being broken is a good sign; this logic is sound. --- Dividing into 14 parts and buying one part each day—that's gambling on the probability. --- Still sharing ideas despite floating losses—this guy really dares. --- Can WLFI break 0.2 this time? I'm really looking forward to it. --- Moving stop-loss closer upwards; it sounds simple but doing it is mentally exhausting. --- Chased in at 0.176 and then straight down to 0.173—this rhythm is truly torturous. --- The two-week moving average approaching the current price—that's a rebound gamble. --- If a false breakout scares you, pause and add to your position—that's good judgment. --- The question is, what's the actual probability of breaking below the MA20?
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 01-10 21:07
I agree with the logic of dense moving averages, but a $600,000 trade at once is indeed a bit aggressive. Dividing into 14 positions is definitely more stable than chasing in a single move, just worried about execution capability being disrupted by emotions. Let's see if we can break through this wave; there is still hope in terms of probability.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistantvip
· 01-10 17:41
The dense moving averages, I’ve been playing with this set since last year, and it’s really useful. Betting all 600,000 at once takes guts, but I can’t diversify that much. It’s about the daily moving averages and stop-loss points—sounds simple, but in practice, it’s easy to get caught up. Whether WLFI can rise depends on whether it can break through that key resistance. Gradually increasing in 14 parts is theoretically perfect, but in reality, who can stick to daily trading? Once Ma20 breaks, you have to run; that red line is truly a life-and-death line. Two weeks’ forecast might be a bit optimistic; the market can change suddenly, so prepare for the worst. When the moving averages are close together, it’s the biggest test of mental strength—greedy when it rises a little, timid when it falls a little. Setting stop-loss at the current price sounds good, but the gap between imagination and reality is something I’ve seen many times. Waiting to see WLFI’s subsequent trend, hope it’s not just another story coin.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYearsvip
· 01-10 08:01
The logic of dense moving averages is indeed resistant to manipulation, but the key is to exercise restraint and not go all in at once. Spending 600,000 all at once is a bit aggressive. Luckily, the MA20 didn't break, so it was a false alarm. Following the plan to buy in batches is like this; when you can't hold on anymore, that's when it really tests you. WLFI seems to have the potential to break out this time, but I'm just worried it might be another false breakout.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobovip
· 01-10 02:53
The logic of dense moving averages sounds reasonable, but when it drops directly from 0.188 to 0.173, the mentality is really tested. The daily batch method is basically encouraging oneself to cut deeper; after all, there's always a backup plan. WLFI can rise, but it depends on whether it can break through the key resistance later; otherwise, it's just a false breakout. Investing 600,000 USD is a bit aggressive, but since the MA20 is still there, it's just a gamble. Will it reach 0.155 tomorrow? Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStackingvip
· 01-10 02:53
A pursuit of 600,000 USD gets cut immediately, haha, I understand this feeling --- Multiple entries on the moving averages, it sounds simple but really hard to endure in practice --- As long as the MA20 hasn't broken, there's still hope. This logic is indeed solid --- Doubling the profit and loss ratio in two weeks? I feel like it hasn't been that smooth for me --- Dividing into 14 parts, one per day. Hearing you say that, it seems like it can really help avoid many risks --- Cut directly from 0.188 to 0.173, now it's completely killed, no wonder you're anxious --- Keeping some cards in hand is definitely more reassuring than going all-in --- Wait, the current position is already enough to make a profit, and you want to rely on moving the moving average upward to expand the profit and loss ratio? That's a bit greedy --- This logic might be prone to repeated cuts in a choppy market --- Honestly, I don't have much feeling about WLFI, but the signal of dense moving averages is worth paying attention to --- Sharing trading ideas while still in floating loss, this courage is commendable --- Dynamic stop-loss following the moving average, this idea is still interesting
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategistvip
· 01-10 02:52
A total of $600,000 bet all in, this kind of courage is really something. But as long as the MA20 hasn't broken, there's still hope. I agree with the idea of dense moving averages, but the approach of buying one part daily in 14 parts—ask yourself if you can stick to it for several days. The pattern has formed; the key is whether it can effectively break through the resistance level at 0.188. If this wave truly develops into a trend, it will be a classic risk release, and things could get very interesting later. Chasing high at 0.176 with $600,000 is indeed a bit reckless. But since the MA20 is still supporting, let's keep watching. The problem is, if it drops to 0.173 and you haven't cut, it shows your psychological expectations weren't low to begin with. Whether that's good or bad is hard to say for now. Dynamic stop-loss sounds good, but in actual trading, it often turns into dynamic losses. Not mocking you, just saying. The plan to add positions in 14 parts sounds very rational, but the real test is whether you can stick to the 12th part during the next big crash.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorkervip
· 01-10 02:52
The theory of dense moving averages sounds good, but this wave of WLFI operation is indeed a bit aggressive. Chasing in 600,000 all at once—one must be very confident to dare to do this.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarkervip
· 01-10 02:29
well technically the whole "14 slices per day" thing is just dca with extra steps but yeah the ma clustering logic actually checks out... got liquidated twice trying this on alts tho ngl
Reply0
MerkleTreeHuggervip
· 01-10 02:27
Pursuing $600,000 just to relieve anxiety—this mindset needs adjustment.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)