2026-01-10 01:22:13

The Walrus protocol has achieved a technological breakthrough in the field of decentralized storage. Compared to traditional cloud storage solutions, its cost has decreased by a factor of 100, while security has increased by a magnitude of ten thousand — these comparison figures reflect the fundamental differences in architecture. More notably, the protocol supports dynamic modification and deletion of data, which is uncommon in decentralized storage, expanding the boundaries of application scenarios.

From individual users to enterprise-level applications, Walrus can provide suitable solutions. The ecosystem token $WAL plays a key role by incentivizing participants to run storage nodes and participate in staking, forming a self-sustaining economic model. This design not only reduces the difficulty of cold start for the network but also ensures the interests of long-term participants. As more developers join, the application boundaries of decentralized storage are continuously being expanded, and Web3’s privacy protection is thus supported by more solid infrastructure.

WAL3,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainDetective

· 10h ago

Hmm... a 100x reduction in costs and a ten-thousandfold increase in security—these numbers seem a bit too neat. According to on-chain data, we need to dig deeper into the actual flow of $WAL before we can believe it. --- Dynamic deletion of this feature... interesting, it's obviously an attempt to evade certain on-chain traceability. --- $WAL incentive mechanism self-circulating? After analysis, it depends on whether the node distribution has large address monopolies. --- Wow, from individual to enterprise-level adoption, I guessed this kind of rhetoric long ago—typical fundraising talk. --- Decentralized storage + privacy protection, this combo... through multi-address tracking, I want to see what the real node staking data looks like. --- Cost really down by 100 times? I need on-chain evidence, don’t just tell stories. --- What’s suspicious is this token economic model; cold start might actually make it easier for early big players to dominate, right?

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 23h ago

Is the claim that costs are reduced by 100 times true? It sounds a bit incredible.

View OriginalReply0

TokenUnlocker

· 01-10 01:52

Cost reduced by 100 times? That number sounds a bit scary; we need to see how it performs in practice.

View OriginalReply0

FalseProfitProphet

· 01-10 01:44

Cost reduced by a hundred times? Sounds pretty unlikely. Let's see it implemented first.

View OriginalReply0

All-InQueen

· 01-10 01:40

Can costs really be reduced by 100 times? That number is outrageous; you have to actually use it to know. Dynamic deletion is quite interesting; it finally solves the old pain point of Web3 storage. How is the $WAL incentive model? Could it be another scam like other worthless tokens? Wait, I'm a bit skeptical about the claim that security has increased ten thousand times. It looks good, but the key is when it can actually be implemented.

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 01-10 01:28

Cost reduced by 100 times? Sounds pretty unbelievable; it depends on how it performs in practice.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective