2026-01-07 09:29:53

Making 2.4m on a 5-6m peak? Mathematically doesn't check out.

But here's the thing—those viral engagement numbers? They're currency on their own. Post with that kind of reach and suddenly you're qualified for platform monetization. Nobody's really farming organic eyeballs anymore; they're farming the algorithm's attention span. The checks follow the views, whether the market math adds up or not.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 01-07 19:13

The algorithm is dead, but account traffic is eternal.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-07 09:59

In plain terms, traffic equals money; math isn't important.

View OriginalReply0

ArbitrageBot

· 01-07 09:59

Algorithmic economics is so absurd; numbers lie, but money is real.

View OriginalReply0

RektCoaster

· 01-07 09:56

Wow, this is the current ecosystem. As long as the numbers look good, that's all that matters.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 01-07 09:53

Algorithm-driven sales, data is the truth. Since it's all a scam anyway, let's not bother with that math.

View OriginalReply0

LongTermDreamer

· 01-07 09:43

Algorithms are the new ATM; even if the numbers don't match, you still have to push in.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-07 09:40

ah, the transmutation of engagement into yield... classic financial alchemy, but the math's fundamentally broken here. algorithm's just another oracle that lies convincingly enough.

Reply0

alpha_leaker