$BOMP brings fresh tech to the table. Here's what we know from the market: every major project that broke through the 10M ceiling went through a retracement right after launch day. It's almost a ritual at this point.
Look at $snowball, $whitewhale—same pattern played out. Even attempts to pump things artificially fell flat. The ones who got there first? They tend to stay on top. Early movers carry a real edge that's tough to replicate later on. The innovation matters, but timing and positioning matter just as much.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OldLeekNewSickle
· 1h ago
This tactic has been played out, breaking 10M will inevitably pull back, those who bought in the morning indeed made a lot of profit.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 01-07 21:59
Honestly, I'm tired of this routine. Early entrants always make the profit, while those who come later just wait to get chopped for the leek.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-07 21:21
Getting in early is indeed the truth, but can $BOMP withstand the pullback this time? It doesn't seem that simple.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truther
· 01-07 09:54
Honestly, I'm tired of this routine; it's just early-stage bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-07 09:39
Early entry is really the only way to win; arriving late means getting cut.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 01-07 09:35
Early intervention is really key, but don't rely too much on this model theory; each project is different.
---
Whether $BOMP can break 10M is anyone's guess. Anyway, I'm waiting for a pullback before considering.
---
To be honest, the first batch of investments indeed had fewer troubles, but copying later ones is difficult.
---
It's the same old excuse... snowball and whitewhale are not guaranteed winners for all early projects. Don't be fooled by survivor bias.
---
Timing is indeed important, but how many projects can really come out now?
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquid
· 01-07 09:35
Early bottom-fishing always profits, later entrants are just eager to take over the leftovers.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 01-07 09:35
ngl This routine has been rotten for a long time. Whoever gets in first wins, it's that simple.
---
$BOMP Even if it reaches new highs, it still has to survive the pullback. Just looking at it is annoying.
---
Early bottom-fishing always pays off... I missed it again.
---
What does the failure of pump indicate? Is the market becoming rational or just losing heat?
---
If only we hadn't slept during Snowball and WhiteWhale times, we would have made a fortune haha.
---
Timing > innovation, that's the truth. No matter how advanced the technology is, if no one takes the bait, it's useless.
---
After all the effort, it's still a gamble. Nothing beats speed more than tenfold coins.
$BOMP brings fresh tech to the table. Here's what we know from the market: every major project that broke through the 10M ceiling went through a retracement right after launch day. It's almost a ritual at this point.
Look at $snowball, $whitewhale—same pattern played out. Even attempts to pump things artificially fell flat. The ones who got there first? They tend to stay on top. Early movers carry a real edge that's tough to replicate later on. The innovation matters, but timing and positioning matter just as much.