2026-01-07 08:27:46

There are many complaints about the BSC ecosystem, with some pointing out that the behavior of certain leading participants is detrimental to the long-term development of the chain. But rather than getting caught up in criticism, it's better to focus on actual construction—after all, for the ecosystem to develop, it still depends on products and applications to speak for itself.

Recently, I saw interactions among a few key figures within the ecosystem, and these actions to some extent also reflect a shift in attitude towards the development direction. Building might indeed be the most direct way to resolve these controversies.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainTherapist

· 01-07 08:57

Stop rambling, if you have something real, just say it.

View OriginalReply0

MidsommarWallet

· 01-07 08:56

No matter how much trash talk, it’s useless; the real measure is on-chain activity. Construction is indeed the only way out; say less nonsense and do real work. Complaining every day is less effective than rolling up your sleeves and working; the ecosystem depends on products speaking for themselves. This wave of key人物 interaction feels like they are really going to get serious. Arguing is pointless; BSC still needs practical people. Instead of insulting here, think about what useful applications can be built. Builders vs. complainers, the builders still win in the end. This statement is not wrong, but the real question is: are there really people building? Actions will always outweigh words; simple and straightforward but effective. See if we can get out of the controversy; it all depends on who will really build next.

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 01-07 08:56

That's right, just complaining is useless; someone needs to actually get to work. It's really about lacking good projects; no matter how much collaboration there is, it can't save the situation. BSC has indeed been disappointing these two years, but who is willing to take the initiative to build? It sounds good, but the key is whether genuine projects will emerge later. More actions ≠ truly improving; let's wait and see. Just adjusting the attitude isn't as effective as directly launching products to shake things up. Honestly, no matter how much interaction there is, it can't change the fundamental issues.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-07 08:41

nah the whole "just build bro" sermon gets tired when the foundation's already cursed... but tbh those key player moves? that's the real alchemy brewing beneath the surface. dark pools don't fill themselves fr

Reply0

ProtocolRebel

· 01-07 08:35

Complaints are one thing, but these people really need to get serious and do the work. Honestly, the product is the only voice that matters. Key人物 interactions are a good sign; I’m optimistic about this move. Instead of criticizing every day, it’s better to see who can actually create something. Construction is the way to break the deadlock; everything else is empty talk. The actions are here; now it depends on whether they can deliver later. The competition is fierce, and without a product, you'll be eliminated.

View OriginalReply0