American banking recently ran into a big problem. The GENIUS Act was found to have significant loopholes, and the U.S. Banking Association is rushing to fix them. The bill was originally designed to give banks more flexibility in providing loans to crypto companies (including mining farms, exchanges, etc.), but flaws in its design could cause things to spiral out of control.
In simple terms, the issues mainly revolve around these aspects:
First, the original intention of the bill was to relax banks' credit restrictions on the crypto industry to improve market liquidity. However, once the loopholes are exploited, banks might overextend their credit exposure, directly heading into high-risk areas.
Second, small banks are the biggest victims. They lack the risk control capabilities and capital reserves of large banks. If the crypto market experiences severe volatility, these banks could be hit hardest. The lessons from the FTX incident last year are still fresh—several financial institutions suffered huge losses due to excessive exposure.
Third, if these loopholes are not closed promptly, it could trigger a chain reaction of "crypto market collapse → financial institutions default." Especially with large inflows of stablecoins like USDT and USDC into the crypto ecosystem, systemic risk could be amplified.
The current situation is quite interesting: banks want to benefit from the growth of the crypto industry but are also afraid of being hit back by volatility. The final revision of the bill is still under negotiation and may become more cautious and conservative than originally planned. This could put short-term pressure on crypto companies' financing environment, but from a systemic stability perspective, this "reassessment" might not be entirely a bad thing.
The future direction depends on how regulators balance market innovation with risk prevention.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LazyDevMiner
· 01-09 12:42
This GENIUS bill loophole being exposed is really hilarious, it just shows that banks never really thought it through and just want a piece of the pie.
Small banks are going to suffer this time; their risk control capabilities are far behind. They've learned nothing from the FTX lesson.
Speaking of which, if a collapse really happens, stablecoins like USDT and USDC will also be thrown into chaos. Systemic risk is no joke.
Banks want to have their cake and eat it too, but they're afraid of getting burned. This tug-of-war... The revised plan will probably be much more conservative.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-07 08:56
It's another vulnerability and a collapse... Banks doing this kind of thing will eventually fail. The FTX pit hasn't been filled yet.
The CEO is probably tapping his foot in the office now. Poor risk control and still taking on risks—this business is too loss-making.
So many stablecoins flooding in, system risk leverage is maxed out. When it reaches a critical point, one fuse will set it off.
I just want to know, why do we always have to learn caution from bloody lessons...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 01-07 08:55
It's the same old trick again, wanting to have a taste of the crab but afraid of getting burned. Small banks really need to be careful.
If small banks dare to go all in on crypto again, I think it's not far from a collapse... They haven't fully understood the FTX incident yet.
Regulators have finally reacted, but it's too late; someone has already been enjoying the loopholes to the fullest.
Trying to carve out a share from crypto and ending up being cut back in return—banks have really sharpened this knife.
Systemic risk is like a ticking time bomb; the more stablecoins there are, the more dangerous it becomes...
Being more conservative is actually good; compared to those wildly growing projects, at least they won't suddenly go to zero.
After this round of revisions, fundraising will definitely become more difficult, and entrepreneurs should be feeling anxious.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 01-07 08:54
Here comes another bad show from traditional finance... The GENIUS漏洞 thing, to put it simply, is that old banks want to reap the benefits of crypto but are afraid of falling flat on their faces.
Small banks have truly become cannon fodder this time. They dare to go all in because their risk control capabilities can't keep up. Serves them right.
Let's wait and see. As this bill keeps changing, it will become useless... The crypto financing environment will once again freeze over.
What about the lesson from the FTX incident? Have these people really learned anything?
The larger the liquidity of stablecoins, the greater the systemic risk... No one wants to admit this.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 01-07 08:29
It's the same story again. Banks want to take a bite but are afraid of choking. The loopholes should have been closed long ago.
Small banks are really in trouble. FTX hasn't even recovered yet.
During the chaos of stablecoin dumping, these loopholes are like timed bombs.
If you ask me, regulations should be stricter. Don't bother with those half-baked bills.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-07 08:29
It's the same story again—banks want to take a bite but are afraid of getting pricked, a typical situation.
Small banks are really going to suffer this time; they haven't learned from the FTX lesson yet.
Basically, it's greed—insisting on using leverage to gamble on crypto. Now that vulnerabilities have emerged, they're panicking.
Systemic risk definitely needs attention, but can regulators even think of that?
This bill keeps changing, but in the end, the conservatives still win, which is good news for short-term bears.
American banking recently ran into a big problem. The GENIUS Act was found to have significant loopholes, and the U.S. Banking Association is rushing to fix them. The bill was originally designed to give banks more flexibility in providing loans to crypto companies (including mining farms, exchanges, etc.), but flaws in its design could cause things to spiral out of control.
In simple terms, the issues mainly revolve around these aspects:
First, the original intention of the bill was to relax banks' credit restrictions on the crypto industry to improve market liquidity. However, once the loopholes are exploited, banks might overextend their credit exposure, directly heading into high-risk areas.
Second, small banks are the biggest victims. They lack the risk control capabilities and capital reserves of large banks. If the crypto market experiences severe volatility, these banks could be hit hardest. The lessons from the FTX incident last year are still fresh—several financial institutions suffered huge losses due to excessive exposure.
Third, if these loopholes are not closed promptly, it could trigger a chain reaction of "crypto market collapse → financial institutions default." Especially with large inflows of stablecoins like USDT and USDC into the crypto ecosystem, systemic risk could be amplified.
The current situation is quite interesting: banks want to benefit from the growth of the crypto industry but are also afraid of being hit back by volatility. The final revision of the bill is still under negotiation and may become more cautious and conservative than originally planned. This could put short-term pressure on crypto companies' financing environment, but from a systemic stability perspective, this "reassessment" might not be entirely a bad thing.
The future direction depends on how regulators balance market innovation with risk prevention.