After all these years in Web3, I've seen too many projects follow the same套路—overwhelming launch hype, rapid fundraising, stories getting more and more polished. The entire industry has fallen into a traffic competition, everyone fighting for attention, while the most core aspects are being neglected.
Walrus's approach is completely different. It doesn't chase after noisy hot topics; instead, it focuses all its energy on one point: how to ensure data can be truly used in any environment.
To put it more plainly on the technical level, it doesn't adopt centralized file storage or simple server replication schemes. Instead, it uses erasure coding to split data into fragments, and only when enough fragments are gathered can the original information be restored. This design may seem complex, but it addresses a fundamental issue: the risk of single points of failure.
Imagine if a smart contract relies on a centralized data source to execute logic—if the data is tampered with or the service provider encounters issues, the certainty of the entire chain becomes a joke. Data that can't be verified can't be reliably incorporated into deterministic execution results.
WAL on the Sui chain is responsible for node incentives, staking, and governance mechanisms, and it has embedded verification logic from the start. This isn't some flashy innovation; it's the necessary rigor—ensuring data reliability from the source.
Honestly, temporary hype and volume will fade away. Only true usability and technical robustness can withstand the test of time. For developers, shifting from reliance on a single cloud service to this fragmented, verifiable storage system is the real path Web3 should take.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenTaxonomist
· 12h ago
per my analysis, erasure coding isn't exactly novel—but statistically speaking, most projects won't actually implement it correctly. data suggests otherwise on the "truly usable" claim though... lemme pull up my spreadsheet on storage reliability metrics. curious how many devs will actually migrate from centralized apis or if this stays a theoretical phylogenetic branch nobody adopts
Reply0
GateUser-e19e9c10
· 01-09 14:39
Finally, I see projects that don't rely on gimmicks anymore; focusing solely on technology is truly somewhat rare.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715c
· 01-09 04:36
Finally, a project that doesn't rely on storytelling. Honestly focusing on technology is the right way.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDips
· 01-07 08:46
Another low-key project that quietly gets things done, much better than those who spend all day riding the hype. Erasure coding truly solves the problem and can be considered a real foundational infrastructure idea.
---
Hype is ultimately虚的, whether it can be truly used is the real key.
---
Exactly right, I'm just worried that if the data source has issues, the entire chain will be doomed. The Walrus approach is indeed more solid.
---
No deception in fundraising, no playing with stories—these are the ones that should be recognized.
---
A brilliant move to transition from centralized cloud services.
---
Technical robustness can truly withstand the test of time, a hundred times more important than the speed of fundraising.
---
The design of erasure coding is indeed clever; the single point of failure is eliminated instantly.
---
Projects that work quietly are often more formidable, and will surprise everyone when they suddenly make a splash.
---
Embedding verification logic from the source—that's the way it should be.
---
Reliability > hype; finally, someone has prioritized this correctly.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 01-07 08:45
Finally, there is a project that isn't here to just cut leeks... This is the right approach—ensuring data reliability from the source. That's how it should be done.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamer
· 01-07 08:40
This is what I wanted to see. Three years ago, I called for a "return to technology," and back then I was mocked. Now I realize that only the projects that didn't boast are still around today. Walrus's low profile this time is quite impressive. Erasure coding may sound dull, but it truly hits the pain points of Web3—who still wants to be exploited by single points of failure? The cyclical theory of history states that after the hype fades, what remains are always the solid projects.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 01-07 08:29
Finally, I see someone not just talking nonsense. Erasure coding is indeed solid; it really has to solve the problem effectively.
View OriginalReply0
TaxEvader
· 01-07 08:29
Wow, finally seeing a project that isn't just hyping and is really focused on technology is rare.
After all these years in Web3, I've seen too many projects follow the same套路—overwhelming launch hype, rapid fundraising, stories getting more and more polished. The entire industry has fallen into a traffic competition, everyone fighting for attention, while the most core aspects are being neglected.
Walrus's approach is completely different. It doesn't chase after noisy hot topics; instead, it focuses all its energy on one point: how to ensure data can be truly used in any environment.
To put it more plainly on the technical level, it doesn't adopt centralized file storage or simple server replication schemes. Instead, it uses erasure coding to split data into fragments, and only when enough fragments are gathered can the original information be restored. This design may seem complex, but it addresses a fundamental issue: the risk of single points of failure.
Imagine if a smart contract relies on a centralized data source to execute logic—if the data is tampered with or the service provider encounters issues, the certainty of the entire chain becomes a joke. Data that can't be verified can't be reliably incorporated into deterministic execution results.
WAL on the Sui chain is responsible for node incentives, staking, and governance mechanisms, and it has embedded verification logic from the start. This isn't some flashy innovation; it's the necessary rigor—ensuring data reliability from the source.
Honestly, temporary hype and volume will fade away. Only true usability and technical robustness can withstand the test of time. For developers, shifting from reliance on a single cloud service to this fragmented, verifiable storage system is the real path Web3 should take.