2026-01-07 07:20:56

#数字资产行情上升 Recently adjusting the portfolio, I am continuously increasing my positions in the three mainstream coins: $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL . I just skip the smaller coins altogether, as the risks are too high and the returns are uncertain. Why bother?

My principle is actually very simple—any coin that has historically lost 100% of its value, I avoid. Focus on the mainstream giants; long-term stability is the key. Instead of being fooled by the ups and downs of various small coins, it's better to concentrate on assets with real liquidity and consensus.

When the market rebounds, mainstream coins are often the first to benefit. In this round of market movement, it’s worth paying more attention to the performance of these leading coins.

BTC-0,7%

ETH-0,87%

SOL-1,98%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UncleLiquidation

· 01-09 00:12

It's the same logic, small-cap coins are really a trap, better to hold onto BTC and ETH firmly. After playing for so long, I finally understand that stability is key to longevity. SOL's recent surge is pretty good, it feels like the mainstream is truly mainstream. Just pretend you haven't heard about small-cap coins. The idea of adding more to BTC is correct, you should do it now. ETH has hit the bottom, what are you hesitating for? This is called investment wisdom, avoiding risks is the top priority. That's right, liquidity is the key. Leading coins take the spotlight, this is how the game is played.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-07 07:51

Add positions in the three mainstream drivers, I really respect this approach. Small coins are indeed a harvesting machine for retail investors. Well said, liquidity is the hard currency; don’t be blinded by the price surges of altcoins. When mainstream coins rebound, that feeling is solid, unlike the shock of small coins crashing overnight. Honestly, this is a stable strategy; those who hold mainstream coins long-term are all smiling. During market fluctuations, just hold BTC and ETH, everything else is noise. Your principle is good; coins that have caused losses should be permanently blacklisted. SOL has performed well in this round, matching the right rhythm. Mainstream coins have consensus and confidence; the tiny gains from small coins are just not worth the gamble.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-07 07:51

Honestly, this logic makes sense. I've been through the pitfalls of small-cap coins; it's basically working for the project teams. But speaking of which, how do you think about the timing of adding positions in BTC, ETH, and SOL this round? How do you interpret the on-chain data?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-07 07:42

Adding to the three main drivers, small coins directly pass, I like this operation --- Mainstream coins are indeed stable, just the gains aren't as exciting --- Oh, it's the same theory again, but to be fair, the mainstream troops are indeed more reliable --- $BTC $ETH $SOL, all three adding? Bro, you have plenty of cash on hand --- Small coins are risky, with uncertain returns. Honestly, has anyone made money from them? --- Tired of hearing "long-term steady," but during rebounds, mainstream coins do lead the hype --- Never touch coins that have lost 100%, I stand by this principle, much better than blindly copying coins --- The synergy of the three mainstream giants, this idea is solid --- I like this simple and straightforward logic, not entangled with small coins --- Liquidity plus consensus is indeed the core of choosing coins

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-07 07:31

The mainstream triangle indeed remains stable, but I think SOL's recent performance is a bit disappointing. I agree with increasing positions in BTC and ETH, but your statement about small-cap coins is too absolute. A coin that has historically lost 100%? Bro, that logic has flaws—do you understand survivor bias? But to be fair, focusing on the top coins is definitely less stressful. I also get annoyed by those who chase new coins every day. When a rebound comes, mainstream coins will definitely move first. This statement still makes sense. Let me ask you, where are your current costs for BTC and ETH? I am bullish on SOL, but how are you allocating your holdings? Skipping all small coins indeed reduces risk, but it also means missing out on the occasional ten-bagger. It's a dilemma. Stick to the mainstream, and don't get sucked dry by those scam coins.

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 01-07 07:30

nah, sticking to battle-tested assets only makes sense... btc/eth have that consensus finality mainnet needs, sol's validator set is solid enough. the altcoin graveyard is real though, slashing your portfolio for what exactly?

Reply0