This round of airdrops mainly involves several routes: social contribution (Twitter/content creation), Discord identity, on-chain interactions, and collaborations with leading exchange platforms, covering almost all participation channels.
But the收益分化 (profit differentiation) here is particularly obvious. Influencers can earn thousands of $BREV with a single tweet, easily credited. In contrast, medium-sized accounts either put in effort to produce dozens or hundreds of pieces of content, ending up with only a few thousand tokens. For small accounts, relying solely on social contribution might make them ineligible to participate at all, and even if they barely qualify, they can only get a few hundred.
What does this indicate? Account quality and influence are the key factors in determining收益 (revenue). Instead of blindly following trends and forcing content, it's better to focus on building the account itself. Once account popularity, follower quality, and content tone are established, the rewards from such activities can truly multiply.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FomoAnxiety
· 15h ago
It's the same old trick of big influencers eating the meat and small accounts drinking the soup; it's becoming more and more obvious.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-07 07:43
It's the same old story, the big influencers get the meat while small investors drink the soup, playing out again.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 01-07 07:38
The top players are starting to compete again. Big influencers earn thousands while small accounts work hard for just a few hundred... The gap is really astonishing.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-07 07:33
It's the same old story again, big influencers get the benefits while small investors are left with scraps. This is the truth of Web3, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c5e61f04
· 01-07 07:24
Hold on tight, we're about to take off 🛫
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c5e61f04
· 01-07 07:24
Hold on tight, we're about to take off 🛫
View OriginalReply0
GasBandit
· 01-07 07:21
It's the same old trick again—big influencers make easy money while small investors work themselves to death. So funny.
Brevis Airdrop Gameplay Breakdown is here.
This round of airdrops mainly involves several routes: social contribution (Twitter/content creation), Discord identity, on-chain interactions, and collaborations with leading exchange platforms, covering almost all participation channels.
But the收益分化 (profit differentiation) here is particularly obvious. Influencers can earn thousands of $BREV with a single tweet, easily credited. In contrast, medium-sized accounts either put in effort to produce dozens or hundreds of pieces of content, ending up with only a few thousand tokens. For small accounts, relying solely on social contribution might make them ineligible to participate at all, and even if they barely qualify, they can only get a few hundred.
What does this indicate? Account quality and influence are the key factors in determining收益 (revenue). Instead of blindly following trends and forcing content, it's better to focus on building the account itself. Once account popularity, follower quality, and content tone are established, the rewards from such activities can truly multiply.