2026-01-07 06:29:35

Recently explored privacy storage projects on the Sui chain, and some findings are worth discussing.

The technical aspect is indeed interesting. The core relies on erasure coding combined with blob storage, directly reducing storage costs to only 20% of traditional cloud services—this is not just talk, actual cases demonstrate it. After migrating, a certain NFT platform experienced an 80% reduction in data leaks and a 60% decrease in operational costs, with stability at 99.9%.

In terms of ecosystem design, the $WAL token is not just a hype concept. Private transactions, dApp deployment, governance staking—all integrated, forming a complete access pass system. I tried the staking process, and the annualized yield can reach 15%, which is still attractive to participants.

Looking ahead, Gartner predicts that AI combined with zero-knowledge proofs will explode in the healthcare and cross-border finance sectors, reaching a market size of $50 billion by 2030. From this perspective, anti-censorship and fault-tolerant architecture are indeed laying out the future.

Of course, it’s also important to see clearly that cross-chain compatibility and sustainable governance mechanisms still need refinement. Currently, those entering are mainly experiencing the benefits of storage efficiency; whether it can attract large-scale applications later depends on the pace of ecosystem development.

SUI0,45%

WAL2,44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketMonk

· 01-07 08:30

20% cost reduction directly, is this data real or fake? Cutting costs by a bit is easy, but the concern is whether governance will falter later An annualized 15% sounds okay, but it depends on stability Privacy storage definitely needs attention; reducing leaks by 80% is a real necessity If the cross-chain shortcoming isn't addressed, large-scale application is still a pipe dream I'm also watching $WAL staking, just waiting to see if real dApps will connect in the future

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-07 06:58

Reducing costs to 20% sounds a bit outrageous, but if there are real cases to support it, then it's worth paying attention to --- Annualized 15% staking returns? Don't rush to go all-in, see how long it can last first --- Zero-knowledge proofs combined with AI—heard that too many times. Everyone will be drawing the 2030 roadmap --- Privacy storage sounds high-end, but the key is whether there are real major applications integrated --- How to verify the claim of an 80% reduction in data leakage rate? Feels a bit like marketing --- Cross-chain compatibility isn't even settled yet, and they're already talking about ecosystem layout. Seems a bit backwards --- What level is 99.9% availability on the chain? Haven't compared it with other solutions --- The technology looks good, but it seems that ecosystem development is the real bottleneck

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 01-07 06:52

Wow, cutting 20% of costs directly is quite impressive. The NFT case with an 80% leak rate reduction? That doesn't seem quite right. How exactly was it measured? An annualized 15% staking sounds good, but it depends on whether it will crash later. The prediction of a 50 billion market by 2030, it seems every project says the same thing haha. If cross-chain compatibility isn't sorted out yet, no matter how much you boast now, it's useless. The key is the pace of ecosystem development. Who can really survive until next year?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationTherapist

· 01-07 06:50

20% of costs is really a skill, but how is 99.9% availability guaranteed? --- An annualized 15% sounds good, but how long can this governance mechanism last? --- I believe in an 80% reduction in storage costs; large-scale application is the real test --- The set of zero-knowledge proofs is indeed impressive, but who is actually using it now? --- NFT platform data leaks have decreased by 80%, where does this data come from? --- $WAL isn't that the kind of "complete ecosystem" statement again? --- Cross-chain compatibility is still being refined, isn't that just not being ready yet? --- 15% annualized, doubt whether it's early-stage incentives or real returns --- More privacy projects are on Sui, why wouldn't this one run away?

View OriginalReply0

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 01-07 06:50

Oh no, 20% cost? That number sounds a bit suspicious. Wait, 15% annualized? I need to jump in and try to get some rewards. Sui is doing something new again, but the ecological construction really raises some questions. Lower costs and fewer leaks—I'm convinced by this logic. Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed the future, but it's still too early. If cross-chain compatibility isn't good, saving money is pointless. $WAL token design is quite interesting, but we'll have to see if it can be implemented later.

View OriginalReply0