2026-01-07 06:25:35

Security tracking agencies have identified abnormal withdrawal behavior in the Fusion PlasmaVault contract. Approximately $267,000 was transferred to a suspicious address 0x9b1b and subsequently processed through privacy mixing tools. The funds were eventually bridged into the Ethereum network. The incident highlights potential vulnerabilities in the contract's permission management and withdrawal mechanisms, and users should be cautious of similar contract risks. Fund tracing has been initiated.

ETH7,55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CounterIndicator

· 01-10 06:16

Haha, another failed contract. I've seen too many of these cases. --- 26.7K dollars just gone like that. Is permission management so casual? --- Before跑路, gotta mix coins once. This trick is so old it’s worn out. --- PlasmaVault? Never heard of it. Feels like another air project being dug up. --- Privacy mixing tools are really friends of fugitives haha. --- What's the use of tracking funds? Being able to recover them is true skill. --- That's why I never touch unfamiliar contracts. Too many traps. --- Another permission management vulnerability. The development team probably doesn't want to stay involved anymore. --- I just want to know who is behind the 0x9b1b address. It’s probably going to be another failed project. --- Cross-chain outflow from Ethereum is even harder to track. This move is indeed brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMistaker

· 01-07 10:26

It's the same old trick again—contract vulnerabilities, mixer scams, fund tracking... I'm tired of this script. How can some people still dare to throw money into these places? Seriously. If you can't even manage permissions properly, how dare you launch? Laughable. 26.7K USD just gone like that. Heartbreaking for the victims. Forget it, anyway tracking won't bring it back. This is just Web3's daily routine. Using mixer tools, you can tell right away there's something fishy. The signs are too obvious. Who the hell still dares to use this contract? I won't touch it.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceNightmare

· 01-07 06:55

Another contract vulnerability. I’ve been saying these shady Vaults should have been more cautious from the start. Wait, $267,000 just disappeared like that? As soon as you use a mixing tool, the person vanishes. Truly outrageous. If you can't even manage permissions properly, how dare you go live on the mainnet? This is like handing DeFi a knife.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 01-07 06:54

Is this the same trick again? Did PlasmaVault crash? 267,000 Dings sent to a suspicious address, mixing coins and running away. I've seen this script too many times. --- Permission vulnerability? Basically, it's an inside job to withdraw funds. Trying to escape across chains and hide—laughable. --- Why worry about contract risks? This is outright theft. Does fund tracking help? --- As soon as I see a privacy mixing tool, I know the ending—money can't be recovered. --- PlasmaVault? Never heard of it. Probably just a small project riding the hype. --- Talking about permission management vulnerabilities so tactfully—I’ll translate directly: internal personnel embezzling public funds. --- $267,000 disappeared overnight. Do users still need to be cautious? They should be asking why it was so easy to withdraw.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-07 06:53

According to on-chain data, fund outflow incidents caused by this type of permission vulnerability have increased by 47% over the past three months. Stay alert!

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 01-07 06:49

Another "vault" rug pull? $267,000 gone in an instant. These developers are getting bolder and bolder. --- The name PlasmaVault sounds unreliable. Using a coin mixing tool immediately reveals there's something fishy. --- The address 0x9b1b should have been blacklisted long ago. Why are they still allowed to cause trouble? --- Permission management loophole? Basically, insiders are just harvesting profits. Cross-chain transfers are now difficult to trace. --- I just want to know how this $270,000 passed the audit. It feels like audit reports are just for show. --- I've seen this kind of thing too many times. Next time, be more cautious when choosing contracts and see who reviewed them.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMotivator

· 01-07 06:45

$267,000 just gone like that? PlasmaVault really tanked this time.

View OriginalReply0