There are only two types of people participating in trading competitions in the square—either shills working with the market makers to unload positions; or studios using project funds to manipulate data. Do you really think you can earn rewards this way? The profits are minimal, the numbers don’t add up at all, and yet people still risk their lives to join.



Let’s do some careful calculations.

Taking recent tokens as examples, here’s the reward distribution for $RAVE $ZKP $CYS: RAVE, calculated at a token price of 0.34U and 67 tokens, yields about 22.78U; ZKP, at 0.12U per token and 185 tokens, about 22.2U; CYS, at 0.39U times 70 tokens, totals 27.3U. Looks like a decent amount, right? But then look at the trading volume, and you’ll be dumbfounded.

Alpha’s limited order rewards are four times, meaning you need to刷16 times the trading volume. RAVE needs a trading volume of 151,000 to earn that reward, but the actual成交 is only 9,400; ZKP is even more exaggerated, with a target of 274,000, but only 9,400成交; CYS also needs 14,400, but only 7,200成交.

The key issue is slippage cost. The candlestick charts of these tokens are extremely chaotic, with severe price swings. It’s common for a single transaction to eat up 1U. My personal experience is splitting orders into 200U chunks to keep slippage within 0.1U—this is already at the extreme limit.

What about the real costs? For RAVE, 9,400手, divided into 200U per order, requires 47 orders, with total slippage of 4.7U. ZKP, with 17,000手, 85 orders, costs 8.5U. CYS, with 14,400手, 72 orders, costs 7.2U.

The final tally looks like this: RAVE 22.78 minus 4.7 equals 18.08U; ZKP 22.2 minus 8.5 equals 13.7U; CYS 27.3 minus 7.2 equals 20.1U. Sounds okay? But the problem is—this is under ideal conditions.

How deep are the pitfalls in reality?

First, most people simply cannot maintain a slippage of 0.1U per order consistently. The few time windows available for刷 are limited; if a few orders go wrong, profits vanish instantly. Second, you can only place buy and sell orders below the market price, which is a guaranteed way to lose money. Want to wait a few days to sell at a higher price? Want to do swing trading? Just look at the candlestick charts and despair—this isn’t knife-edge trading, it’s suicide. A slip-up or unexpected market volatility can lead to huge losses in minutes.

There’s also an invisible cost—time. Unless you have some black tech studio automation (which, if you really had that tech, you wouldn’t be in crypto earning this little), normal people need to monitor the market manually, which can’t be done in just ten or fifteen minutes. The psychological toll of spending one or two hours daily is unavoidable; calculating opportunity costs, it’s over a hundred dollars a day. Over five days of work, you’d earn more delivering food, with much lower risk.

Bottom line: if you’re still participating in these trading competitions, there are only two possibilities—either you have professional-level skills, or you’re a few cards short of a full deck. I’m not joking.
RAVE2,47%
ZKP-1,42%
CYS-6,61%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
UncommonNPCvip
· 01-10 06:09
Buddy, when you calculate this data, it's truly despairing. Exactly right, besides the studios and pumps, no one can make money. Watching the market every day and still losing money, I just can't understand why some people persist. Seasonal events are just tools to harvest the little guys, don't be fooled. Every time I see these trading competitions, I want to laugh. Do they really think we're all automatic bots? When you factor in the wear and tear costs, the profit evaporates by more than half. This deal isn't unfair to lose. Who would dare to play normally? The risk is dozens of times greater than the reward.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisservip
· 01-09 21:12
It's the same old story, someone always falls for it every time. Daily calculations, yet no one can figure out why people keep rushing in. Honestly, instead of staring at the charts for 5 days, it's better to deliver takeout. This is just a game to harvest the leeks, wake up everyone. The studio and the shills have long divided the cake, we can't even share the soup. Looking at the data looks good, but once you calculate the costs, it’s immediately overwhelming. Slippage kills, without black technology, don’t expect to make money. Instead of participating in the competition, holding coins and sleeping is more comfortable. Your rewards are just our tuition fees.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 01-08 11:33
Wow, comparing this data directly breaks the defense; it's really a blood loss scene. Splitting 200U per order to control wear and tear—this operation is next-level; how could an ordinary person do that? Trading competitions are just a game; I've seen through it long ago. Once the slippage cost appears, the profit disappears; I told you so. Staring at the screen for an hour or two is not as good as delivering takeout; it's really heartbreaking. Brothers still insisting on participating in the competition, you're really overconfident. This account is calculated clearly; who dares to say they can make a profit?
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMevip
· 01-08 09:53
It's just a bloody truth, most people are working for the big players. Someone should have figured this out long ago; wasting time and losing money. Have you seen clearly? Trading competitions are just a game; those who keep participating are either professionals or fools. Slippage is gone in one bite; watching the screen every day is better than delivering takeout. I just want to ask, do the participants really calculate the profit margin, or are they just being PUAed? Once wear and tear costs appear, profits evaporate instantly; who can withstand this? Studio taking money to manipulate data vs retail investors making a bloody profit— is the gap really that big? Instead of wasting time on trading competitions, learn some real skills; stop being fooled. A slight slip can lead to huge losses; with such risks, why do people still insist on participating? No doubt about it, I've long been annoyed by these competitions.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropGrandpavip
· 01-07 06:50
Oh my god, when I do the math, it's really hopeless. It's better to deliver food and earn more. Really, I see those daily trading competitions, they're either shills or studios. Ordinary people have no way out. Slippage eats up everything, and after a day of messing around, it's not as good as delivering food. Who would want to do this? Only a fool. Listing these trading competitions is just a trap. It looks like a reward of dozens of dollars, but the actual cost results in a direct loss. However, there are indeed experts who can control the slippage to 0.1u... I guess I just don't have that skill. Now I have to carefully check the items in the square so I don't fall into the trap again. Honestly, unless you have automation tools, manual brushing is just a waste of life and time.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 01-07 06:47
Really, I've given up on participating in this thing. Just looking at the data, you can tell who is bleeding whom. Trying to make money through trading competitions? Dream on. It's better to get a job. Slippage once and it's all gone. That's why I always lose. This is just a harvesting machine for retail investors. Without professional operations, you can't play at all. Forget it, I’d rather just hold honestly. Looking at these data makes me want to laugh. When I calculate the costs, they are completely negative. Most people participate in this purely for self-deception. Stop fooling yourselves. The most painful part is the time cost. Two hours a day and you’re just earning delivery money. The studio definitely has black technology. Retail investors like us simply can't compete. My friend participated for a month and ended up losing money. Really, don’t touch it.
View OriginalReply0
FrontRunFightervip
· 01-07 06:31
this is just the dark forest playbook repackaged lol... same extraction mechanics, different frontend. they're literally running sandwiches on retail with extra steps and calling it a "trading competition"
Reply0
BlockchainBouncervip
· 01-07 06:29
Oh my god, I really said this trading game is a tool to harvest retail investors. I wanted to delete the exchange halfway through listening, staring at the screen so much my head was about to explode. Slippage is really an invisible scythe, in the blink of an eye, a few U's are gone. The data is so heartbreaking, it feels like all the effort was in vain. Those people in the studio are really good at calculating accounts; we simply can't compete. Isn't that just how it is? Time-consuming, labor-intensive, and still losing money. Instead of wasting time here, why not do something else?
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461vip
· 01-07 06:25
Really, every time I watch these trading competitions I just want to laugh, it's just a front for cutting leeks Delivering takeout makes more money than this, and you still have to watch the market, it's truly a loss Huh, once I calculate these numbers I just get dumbfounded, I can't even break even The studio and the shills are just acting every day, retail investors are just here to be sent to the slaughter Rather than wasting effort, it's better to just HODL, it's more relaxing and you won't lose your hair When I consider the time cost, I just quit trading competitions altogether A slip of the hand and a day's profit is gone, who can handle that? Exactly, hardly anyone can stably lose 0.1U, it's all fake data Anyway, I’m done playing, it's too tiring and too亏, watching others mess around just makes me happy
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)