2026-01-07 06:20:50

Let's be honest: a lot of crypto participants are riding on speculation and thrill-seeking more than anything else. So it's no surprise that the projects gaining crazy momentum and achieving product-market fit tend to operate on mechanisms that look suspiciously like ponzi schemes. The real puzzle though? Keeping those systems afloat long enough while making them accessible and attractive enough for mainstream users to actually jump in. It's a balancing act between feeding the hype and maintaining just enough credibility to keep the whole thing from collapsing.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MagicBean

· 2h ago

In simple terms, it's the art of blowing bubbles—whoever blows the roundest wins.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 01-07 06:49

That was really harsh haha, but that's the current situation.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 01-07 06:43

Basically, it's a game of hot potato; whoever ends up holding the bag at the end is doomed.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoNomics

· 01-07 06:40

nah, here's the thing—if you actually run the tokenomics regression, the correlation between hype cycles and protocol collapse is statistically significant at p<0.01. ponzi mechanics aren't a bug, they're literally baked into the incentive structures. mainstream adoption? ceteris paribus, that requires a fundamental shift in utility, not just prettier ui.

Reply0

Rugpull幸存者