2026-01-06 23:21:00

$M has recently shown impressive performance, with short-term gains stabilizing at 3.05% and a trigger price of 1.68. There are several layers of logic behind this market movement that are worth analyzing.

From a tokenomics perspective, $M adopts a fee-repurchase system, combined with mechanisms like MaxPack, Boost, and MaxPoint, to build a genuine deflationary cycle and user incentive system. This mechanism has proven effective in practical user testing—users participating in trading activities for 48 consecutive hours can convert on-chain signals and community enthusiasm into actual trading volume, indicating that the incentive model is indeed guiding behavior.

At the ecosystem level, Memecore is laying out a new Perps+Yield model, with the official stating that January 2026 is a key milestone. This suggests that functional upgrades and incentive systems are brewing for substantial breakthroughs, and market expectations are gradually being released.

More importantly, community data appears healthy—trade counts are rising, open interest remains stable, indicating that capital inflows are happening under low leverage and high participation conditions. This is not typical of short-term speculation but rather shows that a foundation for sustained accumulation is forming.

M3,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BuyTheTop

· 01-09 19:40

Hmm... This data does look quite comfortable. Low leverage and high participation are the right way to go. --- Transaction fee buyback + deflationary design, I've seen this trick quite a few times. The key is whether it can be truly implemented effectively. --- January 2026? Alright, another deadline. Let's see if it can survive until then first. --- Turning 48-hour incentives into traffic... sounds good, but I'm just worried it might look good on paper but no one actually participates. --- Converting community enthusiasm into real traffic—that's what I want to see. Otherwise, it's all empty talk. --- A steady 3.05% increase is stable, but in the crypto world, what does that really mean? I'm already numb to it. --- The stability of open contracts is indeed worth noting, at least it shows there are no crazy leveraged gamblers wrecking the market. --- Perps+Yield new model sounds appealing, but I feel like projects of this kind always like to make big promises... --- Low leverage accumulation vs short-term speculation—that's the real dividing line between rookies and players, right? --- Wow, finally someone is talking about the deflation cycle as something more than just empty words.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAllDay

· 01-08 23:23

Damn, this time the data for $M$ really seems to be accumulating, not just a superficial pump. Can they really pull it off in January 2026? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-07 05:03

Wait, low leverage and high participation? So how is that different from those air coins that used to be all-in with a single shot?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleSurfer

· 01-06 23:50

Low leverage, high participation? Fine, I believe it. Let's see if they can come up with some tricks by January 2026.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocDetective

· 01-06 23:48

Hmm, are you still accumulating with low leverage? This is what you should be watching.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-06 23:44

The medical records show that $M's clinical performance is still relatively stable, but I have to say— a 3.05% increase combined with that buyback mechanism, it seems more like suppressing the symptoms. What about the underlying fundamental strength? Does 48-hour trading activity prove that incentives are effective? It sounds familiar. I've seen too many short-term participation peaks like this. The key question is whether it can be maintained after six months, or will there be another wave of capital outflows. The January 2026 feature upgrade sounds promising, but the problem is— can the current Perps+Yield model really support the ecosystem? Low leverage and high participation indeed don't seem like hype... but I still recommend regular reviews, and to have risk alerts regarding the stability of open contracts.

View OriginalReply0

HalfIsEmpty

· 01-06 23:38

Wait, what does "low leverage and high participation" mean in this wave? Isn't it just retail investors bottom-fishing?

View OriginalReply0