This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RumbleValidator
· 17h ago
Pouring money without a proper supply mechanism is indeed unprofessional. But I have to say, those who truly understand node consensus can see that the technical execution behind this still has some real skills.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-06 21:57
If you don't understand the supply mechanism and just throw money at it, you really need to reflect. However, the group that truly persisted did make things happen, and that's something to acknowledge.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 01-06 21:56
Ha, this is a truly sincere reflection, much better than those who keep stubbornly resisting. But indeed, mechanics is the key, and many people rush in without even reading the white paper.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 01-06 21:53
In the early days, we didn't think clearly about the supply aspect. Only after stepping into the pit did we understand the difference... But on the other hand, the community's execution capability is really top-notch.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 01-06 21:52
Haha, this is me. I really must have lost my mind back then.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 01-06 21:35
Early on, everyone who jumped into memecoin pitfalls did it like this; the key is whether they learned something afterward.
Looking back, pouring that capital into a memecoin without proper supply mechanics was pure amateur hour on my end. No question there.
That said, huge respect to everyone in this community and the early believers who showed up and built something real. Their execution hit different.
To anyone who wants to dismiss this out of hand—understand the actual mechanics before you jump in.